Garbage hauling, local · Pennsylvania

Valley Waste Service, Inc.

Mars, PA · ~86 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
12.3
Avg TCR
2.6
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Valley Waste Service, Inc. runs at 474% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Garbage hauling, local workplace, earning a grade F.

Valley Waste Service, Inc.: 12.3 TCR = 474% of Garbage hauling, local BLS 2.6 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Valley Waste Service, Inc. safety composite

Valley Waste Service, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 11%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

23/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 12.32 per 100 workers

Safer than 11% of industry peers

DART rate
F 8.12 per 100 workers

Safer than 16% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.6

2016→2024

Valley Waste Service, Inc. injury rate improved

Valley Waste Service, Inc.'s TCR fell 0.6 from 12.4 in 2016 to 11.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 17.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.66× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=12.4 · 2017=6.8 · 2018=16.1 · 2019=14.1 · 2020=9.9 · 2021=17.2 · 2022=15.3 · 2023=7.4 · 2024=11.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 562111 · Mars, PA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 12.3 · 474% of ind

  • DART 8.1 DART
  • RANK #98/116
  • PHOTO Provalet Trash
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 109 inj
  • SIZE ~86 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Provalet Trash (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Valley Waste Service, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Valley Waste Service, Inc. averages 12.3 TCR (474% of the Garbage hauling, local BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Valley Waste Service, Inc. TCR series: 2016=12.4 · 2017=6.8 · 2018=16.1 · 2019=14.1 · 2020=9.9 · 2021=17.2 · 2022=15.3 · 2023=7.4 · 2024=11.7 · BLS 2.6

Where Valley Waste Service, Inc. falls in its industry

2,322 Garbage hauling, local establishments

Safer than 11% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #98 safest of 116 Garbage hauling, local employers in Pennsylvania.

Valley Waste Service, Inc. (86 employees, TCR 12.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 5.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Valley Waste Service, Inc.
Valley Waste Service, Inc. (86 employees, TCR 12.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 5.1

Valley Waste Service, Inc. has more employees than the Garbage hauling, local median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 11.7 8.1 13 0 0
2023 7.4 5.5 8 0 0
2022 15.3 13.3 16 0 0
2021 17.2 10.9 16 3 0
2020 9.9 6.3 11 0 0
2019 14.1 9.1 14 0 0
2018 16.1 12.8 15 0 0
2017 6.8 5.7 6 0 0
2016 12.4 7.4 10 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

562111 · PA · Mars

2,322 Garbage hauling, local employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 25 employers in Mars, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Provalet Trash 12.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR L&L Site Services, Inc. 12.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Recology Humboldt County 12.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Emterra Environmental USA Corp -Bad Axe 12.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE CT Bartoli Mushrooms, Inc. 86 FTE
STATE-SIZE Exelon Power Labs 86 FTE
STATE-SIZE Luzerne Service Building 86 FTE
STATE-SIZE 908-NiSource-Canonsburg-SPT PA 86 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. John 197 FTE
CITY-NEAR Vogel Disposal Company, Inc.. 162 FTE
CITY-NEAR James Austin Company 134 FTE
CITY-NEAR MHY Family Services 120 FTE
NAT-TCR Broken Bow 12.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Madison County EMS 12.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Creasy Springs Health Campus 12.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Trader Joe's 0741 Cary 12.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Chattem Chemicals Inc. 86 FTE
NAT-SIZE Teijin Automotive Technologies, Van Wert, Ohio 86 FTE
NAT-SIZE 34 Recc 86 FTE
NAT-SIZE Frontier Bridge 86 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.