Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction · Pennsylvania

Bronder Technical Services

Prospect, PA · ~127 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
6.4
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Bronder Technical Services runs at 228% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction workplace, earning a grade F.

Bronder Technical Services: 6.4 TCR = 228% of Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction BLS 2.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Bronder Technical Services safety composite

Bronder Technical Services scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 5%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

20/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.38 per 100 workers

Safer than 14% of industry peers

DART rate
F 8.95 per 100 workers

Safer than 5% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Bronder Technical Services: 2.7 → 17.9 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 17.9 TCR · DART/TCR 1.4× in 2024

Bronder Technical Services's TCR rose 15.2 from 2.7 in 2021 to 17.9 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1.4× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237130 · Prospect, PA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 6.4 · 228% of ind

  • DART 8.9 DART
  • RANK #46/54
  • PHOTO NA-US-UT-Draper Salt…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~127 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: NA-US-UT-Draper Salt Lake City-313 West (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Bronder Technical Services in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Bronder Technical Services averages 6.4 TCR (228% of the Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Bronder Technical Services TCR series: 2021=2.7 · 2022=2.6 · 2023=2.4 · 2024=17.9 · BLS 2.8

Where Bronder Technical Services falls in its industry

1,605 Utility line (i.e., communicat establishments

Safer than 14% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #46 safest of 54 Utility line (i.e., communicat employers in Pennsylvania.

Bronder Technical Services (127 employees, TCR 6.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Bronder Technical Services
Bronder Technical Services (127 employees, TCR 6.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0

Bronder Technical Services has more employees than the Utility line (i.e., communication, elect median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 17.9 8.9 2 0 0
2023 2.4 1.6 3 0 0
2022 2.6 0.9 3 0 0
2021 2.7 0.0 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237130 · PA · Prospect

1,605 Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 3 employers in Prospect, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR NA-US-UT-Draper Salt Lake City-313 West 6.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR ElecComm Corporation 6.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mesquite/Distribution & Meter Services 6.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Communication Data Link - Grimes 6.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE C.P. Yeatman & Sons, Inc. 127 FTE
STATE-SIZE Stevens Engineers & Constructors-Pittsburgh 127 FTE
STATE-SIZE Western Region 127 FTE
STATE-SIZE Glasgow, Inc 127 FTE
CITY-NEAR BTS 117 FTE
CITY-NEAR Stephenson Equipment Inc - Butler 33 FTE
NAT-TCR Paramount Senior Living at Polaris 6.4 TCR
NAT-TCR South Shore Millwork, Inc. 6.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Blue Star Growers 6.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Scion Steel - Capitol 6.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Christus Santa Rosa Children's Hospital - EVS 127 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fernandina Mulch and Stone, LLC dba Liberty Landscape Supply 127 FTE
NAT-SIZE First Class Transportation 127 FTE
NAT-SIZE PAM Rehab Roundrock 127 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.