Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Georgia

Brookdale Carrollton

Carrollton, GA · ~42 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.6
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Brookdale Carrollton runs at 279% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Brookdale Carrollton: 10.6 TCR = 279% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Brookdale Carrollton safety composite

Brookdale Carrollton scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 28%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

42/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.62 per 100 workers

Safer than 28% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.02 per 100 workers

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.5

2016→2023

Brookdale Carrollton injury rate improved

Brookdale Carrollton's TCR fell 4.5 from 13.6 in 2016 to 9.1 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2017 at 18.0 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.28× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=13.6 · 2017=18.0 · 2018=7.7 · 2019=12.7 · 2020=8.9 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=15.0 · 2023=9.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Carrollton, GA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 10.6 · 279% of ind

  • DART 3.0 DART
  • RANK #136/205
  • PHOTO Aegis of Kent
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 24 inj
  • SIZE ~42 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Aegis of Kent (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Brookdale Carrollton in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Brookdale Carrollton averages 10.6 TCR (279% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Brookdale Carrollton TCR series: 2016=13.6 · 2017=18 · 2018=7.7 · 2019=12.7 · 2020=8.9 · 2021=0 · 2022=15 · 2023=9.1 · BLS 3.8

Where Brookdale Carrollton falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 28% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #136 safest of 205 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Georgia.

Brookdale Carrollton (42 employees, TCR 10.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Brookdale Carrollton
Brookdale Carrollton (42 employees, TCR 10.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Brookdale Carrollton has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 9.1 3.0 3 0 0
2022 15.0 6.0 5 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 8.9 3.0 3 0 0
2019 12.7 12.7 4 0 0
2018 7.7 7.7 2 0 0
2017 18.0 18.0 4 0 0
2016 13.6 13.6 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · GA · Carrollton

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 93 employers in Carrollton, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Aegis of Kent 10.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pinewood Terrace 10.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Inn at Ashland Woods 10.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Great Lakes Management GTHI Talamore Sun Prairie 10.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Atlas Manufacturing, Inc. 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fieldale Farms - Pullet/Breeder Facility 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE Unlimited Contract Services - Bushnell, FL 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fieldale Farms - Lavonia Hatchery 42 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tanner Medical Center/Carrollton 2,124 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tanner Medical Center / Carrollton 1,691 FTE
CITY-NEAR Decostar 912 FTE
CITY-NEAR Corporate 847 FTE
NAT-TCR Homestead Building Systems, LLC - Orange 10.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Morrison Brothers Building Center LLC 10.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Millcreek Community Hospital 10.6 TCR
NAT-TCR T & T Cleaning and Restoration 10.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Rio Vista Farms LLC 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE 55437 Detroit Delta Shuttle 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE Intercession City 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE ISD# 834-Andersen Elementary 42 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.