Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · North Carolina

Cambridge House

Hildebran, NC · ~30 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.6
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Cambridge House runs at 279% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Cambridge House: 10.6 TCR = 279% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Cambridge House safety composite

Cambridge House scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 28%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

53/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.62 per 100 workers

Safer than 28% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Cambridge House held a steady TCR band

Cambridge House's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 33.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=11.1 · 2018=10.9 · 2019=3.9 · 2020=33.3 · 2021=32.3 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=4.1 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Hildebran, NC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 10.6 · 279% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #292/356
  • PHOTO Aegis of Kent
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 17 inj
  • SIZE ~30 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Aegis of Kent (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Cambridge House in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Cambridge House averages 10.6 TCR (279% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Cambridge House TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=11.1 · 2018=10.9 · 2019=3.9 · 2020=33.3 · 2021=32.3 · 2022=0 · 2023=4.1 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Cambridge House falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 28% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #292 safest of 356 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in North Carolina.

Cambridge House (30 employees, TCR 10.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Cambridge House
Cambridge House (30 employees, TCR 10.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Cambridge House has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 4.1 0.0 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 32.3 18.5 4 3 0
2020 33.3 20.8 5 3 0
2019 3.9 3.9 1 0 0
2018 10.9 10.9 3 0 0
2017 11.1 11.1 3 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · NC · Hildebran

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 14 employers in Hildebran, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Aegis of Kent 10.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pinewood Terrace 10.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Inn at Ashland Woods 10.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Great Lakes Management GTHI Talamore Sun Prairie 10.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Shugart Farm 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hays Hatchery 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hight Family Farms LLC 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE High Point Operations Center 30 FTE
CITY-NEAR MK Hildebran 223 FTE
CITY-NEAR Geiger Seating MillerKnoll 170 FTE
CITY-NEAR Plant 15 Hildebran 154 FTE
CITY-NEAR Geiger Hildebran 140 FTE
NAT-TCR Designed Cabinets, Inc. 10.6 TCR
NAT-TCR FreshPoint Connecticut 10.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Inspir Carnegie Hill 10.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Amazon Delivery Station DUT4 ALDY 10.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Essential Vegetation Management Services 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE APL Engineered Materials, Inc. 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Home City Ice Company South Elgin 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Parsons Residential Care 30 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.