Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Texas

Brookdale Castle Hills

San Antonio, TX · ~51 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
28.0
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Brookdale Castle Hills runs at 737% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Brookdale Castle Hills: 28.0 TCR = 737% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Brookdale Castle Hills safety composite

Brookdale Castle Hills scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 0%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

13/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 28 per 100 workers

Safer than 0% of industry peers

DART rate
F 48.12 per 100 workers

Safer than 0% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Brookdale Castle Hills: 24.5 → 48.1 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 48.1 TCR · DART/TCR 1.72× in 2018

Brookdale Castle Hills's TCR rose 23.6 from 24.5 in 2016 to 48.1 in 2018. In 2018, DART was 1.72× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · San Antonio, TX ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 28.0 · 737% of ind

  • DART 48.1 DART
  • RANK #469/470
  • PHOTO Morada Grand Prairie
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 15 inj
  • SIZE ~51 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Morada Grand Prairie (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Brookdale Castle Hills in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Brookdale Castle Hills averages 28.0 TCR (737% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Brookdale Castle Hills TCR series: 2016=24.5 · 2017=11.4 · 2018=48.1 · BLS 3.8

Where Brookdale Castle Hills falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 0% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #469 safest of 470 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Texas.

Brookdale Castle Hills (51 employees, TCR 28.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Brookdale Castle Hills
Brookdale Castle Hills (51 employees, TCR 28.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Brookdale Castle Hills has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 48.1 48.1 4 0 0
2017 11.4 11.4 5 0 0
2016 24.5 13.4 6 5 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · TX · San Antonio

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 2,207 employers in San Antonio, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Morada Grand Prairie 28.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Redstone Village Grandview Gardens 27.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Royal Assisted Living at Harwich Village 27.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Woodlands MC Care Properties, LLC 27.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Moore County Gin 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE Goldsmith 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE Titan Directional Drilling 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE Coastal Flow Liquid Measurement, Inc. 51 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bexar County Hospital District 8,703 FTE
CITY-NEAR Legend Oaks Health & Rehabilitation West San Antonio 6,953 FTE
CITY-NEAR ISS Facility Services Inc. 6,177 FTE
CITY-NEAR Buena Vida of San Antonio 5,262 FTE
NAT-TCR JAC Logistics LLC 28.0 TCR
NAT-TCR The Ritz Carlton Laguna Niguel 28.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Banner Seventeen, LLC 28.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Arlington Pointe Nursing & Rehabilitation 28.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Unified Industries, Inc. 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hyatt Place Miami Airport - EAST 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tokai Carbon GE - Hickman Facility 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sealand Mechanical, L.L.C. 51 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.