Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Massachusetts

Royal Assisted Living at Harwich Village

Harwich, MA · ~25 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
27.9
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Royal Assisted Living at Harwich Village runs at 733% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Royal Assisted Living at Harwich Village: 27.9 TCR = 733% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Royal Assisted Living at Harwich Village safety composite

Royal Assisted Living at Harwich Village scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 0%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

27/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 27.87 per 100 workers

Safer than 0% of industry peers

DART rate
D 4.29 per 100 workers

Safer than 42% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Royal Assisted Living at Harwich Village: 17.1 → 38.6 TCR

Peak year 2017 @ 38.6 TCR · DART/TCR 0.15× in 2017

Royal Assisted Living at Harwich Village's TCR rose 21.4 from 17.1 in 2016 to 38.6 in 2017. In 2017, DART was 0.15× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Harwich, MA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 27.9 · 733% of ind

  • DART 4.3 DART
  • RANK #210/210
  • PHOTO Redstone Village Gra…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~25 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Redstone Village Grandview Gardens (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Massachusetts employers → · Look up another →

Royal Assisted Living at Harwich Village in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Royal Assisted Living at Harwich Village averages 27.9 TCR (733% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Royal Assisted Living at Harwich Village TCR series: 2016=17.1 · 2017=38.6 · BLS 3.8

Where Royal Assisted Living at Harwich Village falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 0% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Massachusetts alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #210 safest of 210 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Massachusetts.

Royal Assisted Living at Harwich Village (25 employees, TCR 27.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Royal Assisted Living at Harwich Village
Royal Assisted Living at Harwich Village (25 employees, TCR 27.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Royal Assisted Living at Harwich Village has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2017 38.6 4.3 9 0 0
2016 17.1 17.1 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · MA · Harwich

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,108 rated employers in Massachusetts with headcount on file · 12 employers in Harwich, MA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Redstone Village Grandview Gardens 27.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Woodlands MC Care Properties, LLC 27.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Castle Hills 28.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Moreno Valley SLI, LP 27.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE GREAT BARRINGTON-MA11 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE HANOVER-MA12 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Eversource - Marshfield 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Knollmeyer Building Corp. - 01 25 FTE
CITY-NEAR 100475 216 FTE
CITY-NEAR SUPER STOP & SHOP 0475 196 FTE
CITY-NEAR Robert B Our Company Inc. 161 FTE
CITY-NEAR Regalcare at Harwich LLC 114 FTE
NAT-TCR Redstone Village Grandview Gardens 27.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Safe Generation Logistics and Transportation LLC 27.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Police Department 27.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Community EMS 27.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Atlantic Nurseries, Inc. 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE 3105 Republic Services of South Carolina, Hilton Head 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE GCT - Sharonville 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE GCR - Dayton 25 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.