Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Arizona

Brookdale Chandler Ray Road

Chandler, AZ · ~29 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.8
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Brookdale Chandler Ray Road runs at 153% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

Brookdale Chandler Ray Road: 5.8 TCR = 153% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Brookdale Chandler Ray Road safety composite

Brookdale Chandler Ray Road scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

67/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 5.8 per 100 workers

Safer than 62% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Brookdale Chandler Ray Road: 0.0 → 4.4 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 16.4 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2023

Brookdale Chandler Ray Road's TCR rose 4.4 from 0.0 in 2016 to 4.4 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2018 at 16.4 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Chandler, AZ ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.8 · 153% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #46/173
  • PHOTO Sonida Senior Living…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~29 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Sonida Senior Living, Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

Brookdale Chandler Ray Road in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Brookdale Chandler Ray Road averages 5.8 TCR (153% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Brookdale Chandler Ray Road TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=16.4 · 2020=8.2 · 2023=4.4 · BLS 3.8

Where Brookdale Chandler Ray Road falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 62% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #46 safest of 173 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Arizona.

Brookdale Chandler Ray Road (29 employees, TCR 5.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Brookdale Chandler Ray Road
Brookdale Chandler Ray Road (29 employees, TCR 5.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Brookdale Chandler Ray Road has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 4.4 0.0 1 0 0
2020 8.2 0.0 2 0 0
2018 16.4 16.4 4 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · AZ · Chandler

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 462 employers in Chandler, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Sonida Senior Living, Inc 5.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Burlingame Villa 5.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Palm Beach Gardens 5.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Summit Ridge 5.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Zen - Noh Hay Inc - Spot Road Farm 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Arizona Farm 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Royal Packing Yuma Az 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE EPCOR Water Agua Fria 29 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chandler Campus 6,163 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ocotillo Campus 5,428 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6403-64030510 3,265 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2643-64030510-510001 2,446 FTE
NAT-TCR Ironstone 5.8 TCR
NAT-TCR North Country Engineering 5.8 TCR
NAT-TCR G & B Farm Labor Contracting LLC 5.8 TCR
NAT-TCR RMP Supply Trim inc 5.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Charter Senior LIving 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Siebtechnik TEMA Inc. 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Residence Inn La Quinta 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE BioPro Inc 29 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2020, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.