Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Arizona

Brookdale Chandler Regional

Chandler, AZ · ~48 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
13.0
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Brookdale Chandler Regional runs at 342% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Brookdale Chandler Regional: 13.0 TCR = 342% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Brookdale Chandler Regional safety composite

Brookdale Chandler Regional scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 18%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

30/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 13 per 100 workers

Safer than 18% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.13 per 100 workers

Safer than 30% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.1

2016→2024

Brookdale Chandler Regional injury rate improved

Brookdale Chandler Regional's TCR fell 3.1 from 12.2 in 2016 to 9.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 17.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.47× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=12.2 · 2018=17.6 · 2024=9.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Chandler, AZ ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 13.0 · 342% of ind

  • DART 6.1 DART
  • RANK #139/173
  • PHOTO Narrows Glen
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 14 inj
  • SIZE ~48 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Narrows Glen (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

Brookdale Chandler Regional in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Brookdale Chandler Regional averages 13.0 TCR (342% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Brookdale Chandler Regional TCR series: 2016=12.2 · 2018=17.6 · 2024=9.2 · BLS 3.8

Where Brookdale Chandler Regional falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 18% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #139 safest of 173 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Arizona.

Brookdale Chandler Regional (48 employees, TCR 13.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Brookdale Chandler Regional
Brookdale Chandler Regional (48 employees, TCR 13.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Brookdale Chandler Regional has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 9.2 6.1 3 0 0
2018 17.6 0.0 6 0 0
2016 12.2 0.0 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · AZ · Chandler

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 462 employers in Chandler, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Narrows Glen 13.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Morningside of Auburn 13.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Oakmont of Camarillo 13.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Village Concepts Of Marysville-Grandview Village 13.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE JJAZ Construction, LLC 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE Vastco, Inc 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE RRSC Phoenix 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rikoshea Contracting Inc. 48 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chandler Campus 6,163 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ocotillo Campus 5,428 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6403-64030510 3,265 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2643-64030510-510001 2,446 FTE
NAT-TCR Rocklin 13.0 TCR
NAT-TCR The Landing of O'Fallon 13.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Beacon CT 13.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Estates of Evanston 13.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Paul J Rach Inc. 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE Royal Crown Bottling Co. of Winchester, Inc. 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE National Custom Packing 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE Related Hybrid Companies LLC 20 Hudson Yards 48 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.