Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · West Virginia

Brookdale Charleston Gardens

Charleston, WV · ~67 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.3
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Brookdale Charleston Gardens runs at 164% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

Brookdale Charleston Gardens: 6.3 TCR = 164% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Brookdale Charleston Gardens safety composite

Brookdale Charleston Gardens scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 58% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 47%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

52/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 6.25 per 100 workers

Safer than 58% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.64 per 100 workers

Safer than 47% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Brookdale Charleston Gardens: 5.2 → 7.3 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 7.3 TCR · DART/TCR 0.58× in 2023

Brookdale Charleston Gardens's TCR rose 2.0 from 5.2 in 2020 to 7.3 in 2023. In 2023, DART was 0.58× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Charleston, WV ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 6.3 · 164% of ind

  • DART 3.6 DART
  • RANK #8/10
  • PHOTO Discovery Commons Cy…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~67 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Discovery Commons Cypress Point (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · West Virginia employers → · Look up another →

Brookdale Charleston Gardens in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Brookdale Charleston Gardens averages 6.3 TCR (164% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Brookdale Charleston Gardens TCR series: 2020=5.2 · 2023=7.3 · BLS 3.8

Where Brookdale Charleston Gardens falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 58% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to West Virginia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 10 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in West Virginia.

Brookdale Charleston Gardens (67 employees, TCR 6.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Brookdale Charleston Gardens
Brookdale Charleston Gardens (67 employees, TCR 6.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Brookdale Charleston Gardens has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 7.3 3.6 4 0 0
2020 5.2 5.2 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · WV · Charleston

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 2,269 rated employers in West Virginia with headcount on file · 158 employers in Charleston, WV · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Discovery Commons Cypress Point 6.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2248-63056 6.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Point at Rockridge 6.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR SRC of Kansas, LLC 6.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Vecellio & Grogan_Job# 1000208 67 FTE
STATE-SIZE Star Plastics 67 FTE
STATE-SIZE Trivium Packaging USA, Inc. - Weirton 67 FTE
STATE-SIZE 101-STATE-HUNTINGTON 67 FTE
CITY-NEAR CAMC Memorial Hospital 3,442 FTE
CITY-NEAR CAMC Memorial Division 3,374 FTE
CITY-NEAR Memorial Hospital 3,232 FTE
CITY-NEAR Charleston Area Medical Center General Division 1,990 FTE
NAT-TCR Minger Construction Companies Incorporated 6.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Stellar Industries Hastings Plant Nebraska 6.3 TCR
NAT-TCR 068 Village of Channahon 6.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Industrial Fabricators of Virginia Inc 6.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Police Station 67 FTE
NAT-SIZE BT Scarborough 67 FTE
NAT-SIZE Calvert City Sekisui Speciality Chemicals 67 FTE
NAT-SIZE OAKDALE 67 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.