Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction · Minnesota

Minger Construction Companies Incorporated

Jordan, MN · ~87 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
6.3
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Minger Construction Companies Incorporated runs at 223% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction workplace, earning a grade F.

Minger Construction Companies Incorporated: 6.3 TCR = 223% of Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction BLS 2.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Minger Construction Companies Incorporated safety composite

Minger Construction Companies Incorporated scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 17%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

34/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.25 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.73 per 100 workers

Safer than 40% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Minger Construction Companies Incorporated: 5.5 → 10.4 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 10.4 TCR · DART/TCR 0.28× in 2023

Minger Construction Companies Incorporated's TCR rose 4.9 from 5.5 in 2017 to 10.4 in 2023. In 2023, DART was 0.28× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237110 · Jordan, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 6.3 · 223% of ind

  • DART 1.7 DART
  • RANK #23/32
  • PHOTO Main Office - 01
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 36 inj
  • SIZE ~87 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Main Office - 01 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Minger Construction Companies Incorporated in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Minger Construction Companies Incorporated averages 6.3 TCR (223% of the Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Minger Construction Companies Incorporated TCR series: 2017=5.5 · 2018=4.7 · 2019=5.5 · 2020=5.4 · 2022=6 · 2023=10.4 · BLS 2.8

Where Minger Construction Companies Incorporated falls in its industry

1,614 Utility line (i.e., sewer, wat establishments

Safer than 17% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #23 safest of 32 Utility line (i.e., sewer, wat employers in Minnesota.

Minger Construction Companies Incorporated (87 employees, TCR 6.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Minger Construction Companies Incorporated
Minger Construction Companies Incorporated (87 employees, TCR 6.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Minger Construction Companies Incorporated has more employees than the Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), const median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 10.4 1.7 9 3 0
2022 6.0 0.0 7 0 0
2020 5.4 0.9 6 0 0
2019 5.5 0.0 5 1 0
2018 4.7 3.5 4 0 0
2017 5.5 2.2 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237110 · MN · Jordan

1,614 Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 28 employers in Jordan, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Main Office - 01 6.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR PKG Contracting, Inc, - Minot NAWS WTF 6.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cardinal Civil Contracting, LLC 6.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Vanderpool Construction 6.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE LS Black 87 FTE
STATE-SIZE Herzog Roofing 87 FTE
STATE-SIZE Egan Company - Rochester, MN 87 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cedar Creek Energy Corporation 87 FTE
CITY-NEAR Jordan Public Schools, ISD #717 426 FTE
CITY-NEAR S.M. Hentges & Sons Inc 221 FTE
CITY-NEAR By the Yard, Inc. 106 FTE
CITY-NEAR Minger Construction Co., Inc. 102 FTE
NAT-TCR Stellar Industries Hastings Plant Nebraska 6.3 TCR
NAT-TCR 068 Village of Channahon 6.3 TCR
NAT-TCR VCNA United Materials, LLC 6.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Industrial Fabricators of Virginia Inc 6.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE HT Global Circuits 87 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sioux Area Metro 87 FTE
NAT-SIZE Munson Electric 87 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rocky Coast Builders 87 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.