Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Arkansas

Brookdale Chenal Heights

Little Rock, AR · ~53 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.9
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Brookdale Chenal Heights runs at 75% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade B.

Brookdale Chenal Heights: 2.9 TCR = 75% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Brookdale Chenal Heights safety composite

Brookdale Chenal Heights scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

67/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 2.86 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

DART rate
C 2.48 per 100 workers

Safer than 57% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Brookdale Chenal Heights: 0.0 → 2.5 TCR

Peak year 2017 @ 6.6 TCR · DART/TCR 0.87× in 2023

Brookdale Chenal Heights's TCR rose 2.5 from 0.0 in 2016 to 2.5 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2017 at 6.6 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.87× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Little Rock, AR AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.9 · 75% of ind

  • DART 2.5 DART
  • RANK #17/51
  • PHOTO Country Terrace
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~53 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Country Terrace (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arkansas employers → · Look up another →

Brookdale Chenal Heights in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Brookdale Chenal Heights averages 2.9 TCR (75% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Brookdale Chenal Heights TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=6.6 · 2021=5.2 · 2022=0 · 2023=2.5 · BLS 3.8

Where Brookdale Chenal Heights falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 86% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arkansas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #17 safest of 51 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Arkansas.

Brookdale Chenal Heights (53 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Brookdale Chenal Heights
Brookdale Chenal Heights (53 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Brookdale Chenal Heights has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 2.5 2.5 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 5.2 5.2 2 0 0
2017 6.6 4.4 3 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · AR · Little Rock

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 4,393 rated employers in Arkansas with headcount on file · 446 employers in Little Rock, AR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Country Terrace 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Seacrest Assisted Living 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR HSL 17, LLC 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2248-61099 2.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Peco Foods Inc.- Batesville Hatchery 53 FTE
STATE-SIZE George's Springdale Hatchery 53 FTE
STATE-SIZE Siloam Springs Hatchery 53 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mountain Mechanical 53 FTE
CITY-NEAR Arkansas Children's Hospital 3,946 FTE
CITY-NEAR LITCX0UPS LIT - UPS 3,415 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - LIT1 2,510 FTE
CITY-NEAR Baptist Health Medical Center - Little Rock 2,500 FTE
NAT-TCR Phillips Medisize Corporation - Phillips Medical New Richmond 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Tucker 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 069-El Paso/9817 Dyer 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Farmington Country Club 2.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE County Market #212 53 FTE
NAT-SIZE Davidson'S Organic Tea 53 FTE
NAT-SIZE Divine House Inc. - Hutchinson 53 FTE
NAT-SIZE Knoxville TN Yard (West) 53 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.