Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · New Jersey

Seacrest Assisted Living

Little Egg Harbor, NJ · ~57 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.9
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Seacrest Assisted Living runs at 75% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade B.

Seacrest Assisted Living: 2.9 TCR = 75% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Seacrest Assisted Living safety composite

Seacrest Assisted Living scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

68/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 2.86 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

DART rate
C 2 per 100 workers

Safer than 60% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.6

2022→2024

Seacrest Assisted Living injury rate improved

Seacrest Assisted Living's TCR fell 2.6 from 4.6 in 2022 to 2.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 4.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.7× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=4.6 · 2023=2.0 · 2024=2.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Little Egg Harbor, NJ AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.9 · 75% of ind

  • DART 2.0 DART
  • RANK #18/125
  • PHOTO Country Terrace
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~57 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Country Terrace (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

Seacrest Assisted Living in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Seacrest Assisted Living averages 2.9 TCR (75% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Seacrest Assisted Living TCR series: 2022=4.6 · 2023=2 · 2024=2 · BLS 3.8

Where Seacrest Assisted Living falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 86% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #18 safest of 125 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in New Jersey.

Seacrest Assisted Living (57 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Seacrest Assisted Living
Seacrest Assisted Living (57 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Seacrest Assisted Living has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.0 2.0 1 0 0
2023 2.0 2.0 1 0 0
2022 4.6 2.3 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · NJ · Little Egg Harbor

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 6 employers in Little Egg Harbor, NJ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Country Terrace 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR HSL 17, LLC 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Chenal Heights 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2248-61099 2.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE BL England Generating Station 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE New Jersey American Water-Fire Road 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE Jersey City, NJ 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE NJTA T100.184 Bridge Deck Reconstruction & Misc Structural Improvements 57 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 3830 283 FTE
CITY-NEAR 3830 242 FTE
CITY-NEAR Seacrest Operator 146 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1544 Little Egg Harbor SD 31 FTE
NAT-TCR Mechanical Comfort, Inc. 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 70594 Capstone - Adusa Sp Mauldin Sc 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR JJID, Inc. 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR IA Council Bluffs/SelecTrucks 2.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE BWC Terminals Texas City 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cellox, LLC 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bolingbrook, IL - Windham Pkwy 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hilton Garden Inn Ogden 57 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.