Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Oregon

Brookdale Chestnut Lane Gresham

Gresham, OR · ~47 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
20.5
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Brookdale Chestnut Lane Gresham runs at 539% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Brookdale Chestnut Lane Gresham: 20.5 TCR = 539% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Brookdale Chestnut Lane Gresham safety composite

Brookdale Chestnut Lane Gresham scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 4%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

19/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 20.47 per 100 workers

Safer than 4% of industry peers

DART rate
F 10 per 100 workers

Safer than 15% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−15.4

2016→2018

Brookdale Chestnut Lane Gresham injury rate improved

Brookdale Chestnut Lane Gresham's TCR fell 15.4 from 25.4 in 2016 to 10.0 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2017 at 26.0 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0.49× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=25.4 · 2017=26.0 · 2018=10.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Gresham, OR ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 20.5 · 539% of ind

  • DART 10.0 DART
  • RANK #200/218
  • PHOTO Southview - Oak Park…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 22 inj
  • SIZE ~47 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Southview - Oak Park Senior Living (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oregon employers → · Look up another →

Brookdale Chestnut Lane Gresham in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Brookdale Chestnut Lane Gresham averages 20.5 TCR (539% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Brookdale Chestnut Lane Gresham TCR series: 2016=25.4 · 2017=26 · 2018=10 · BLS 3.8

Where Brookdale Chestnut Lane Gresham falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 4% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oregon alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #200 safest of 218 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Oregon.

Brookdale Chestnut Lane Gresham (47 employees, TCR 20.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Brookdale Chestnut Lane Gresham
Brookdale Chestnut Lane Gresham (47 employees, TCR 20.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Brookdale Chestnut Lane Gresham has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 10.0 10.0 2 0 0
2017 26.0 18.2 10 0 0
2016 25.4 7.6 10 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · OR · Gresham

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 8,031 rated employers in Oregon with headcount on file · 98 employers in Gresham, OR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Southview - Oak Park Senior Living 20.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR 10070 20.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mountview, Elmcroft of 20.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Aegis Lodge 20.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE 00463 ROSEBURG CUST SVC CNTR 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Salem Electric 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Northern Operations Center 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pahlisch Commercial Inc 47 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6994-PL350 934 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6994-MH 899 FTE
CITY-NEAR 350 874 FTE
CITY-NEAR ON Semiconductor Gresham 839 FTE
NAT-TCR QNT - Jefferson 20.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Motherlove Herbal Company 20.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Bear Logistics Services, LLC 20.5 TCR
NAT-TCR RbA Los Angeles 20.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Hilton Garden Inn Joplin 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Green Plains Holding II LLC - Riga 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Sarah Roberts French Home, Inc. 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE KTL 53012 Madison 47 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.