Assisted Living · Minnesota

Southview - Oak Park Senior Living

Oak Park Heights, MN · ~87 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
20.5
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Southview - Oak Park Senior Living runs at 538% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted Living workplace, earning a grade F.

Southview - Oak Park Senior Living: 20.5 TCR = 538% of Assisted Living BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Southview - Oak Park Senior Living safety composite

Southview - Oak Park Senior Living scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 4%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

16/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 20.46 per 100 workers

Safer than 4% of industry peers

DART rate
F 18.74 per 100 workers

Safer than 5% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Southview - Oak Park Senior Living: 13.6 → 21.4 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 24.4 TCR · DART/TCR 0.92× in 2023

Southview - Oak Park Senior Living's TCR rose 7.9 from 13.6 in 2017 to 21.4 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 24.4 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.92× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Oak Park Heights, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 20.5 · 538% of ind

  • DART 18.7 DART
  • RANK #230/240
  • PHOTO Brookdale Chestnut L…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 58 inj
  • SIZE ~87 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Brookdale Chestnut Lane Gresham (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Southview - Oak Park Senior Living in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Southview - Oak Park Senior Living averages 20.5 TCR (538% of the Assisted Living BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Southview - Oak Park Senior Living TCR series: 2017=13.6 · 2018=20.9 · 2019=22.4 · 2020=20.1 · 2022=24.4 · 2023=21.4 · BLS 3.8

Where Southview - Oak Park Senior Living falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted Living establishments

Safer than 4% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #230 safest of 240 Assisted Living employers in Minnesota.

Southview - Oak Park Senior Living (87 employees, TCR 20.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Southview - Oak Park Senior Living
Southview - Oak Park Senior Living (87 employees, TCR 20.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Southview - Oak Park Senior Living has more employees than the Assisted Living median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 21.4 18.7 8 0 0
2022 24.4 24.4 4 7 0
2020 20.1 13.9 9 4 0
2019 22.4 11.9 15 0 0
2018 20.9 13.4 14 0 0
2017 13.6 6.0 8 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · MN · Oak Park Heights

6,510 Assisted Living employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 16 employers in Oak Park Heights, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Chestnut Lane Gresham 20.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Aegis Lodge 20.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Highgate Senior Living Temecula 20.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fountainview at Eisenberg 20.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE LS Black 87 FTE
STATE-SIZE Minger Construction Companies Incorporated 87 FTE
STATE-SIZE Herzog Roofing 87 FTE
STATE-SIZE Egan Company - Rochester, MN 87 FTE
CITY-NEAR Andersen Windows, Inc. 1,177 FTE
CITY-NEAR PHS - Boutwells Landing 395 FTE
CITY-NEAR Boutwells Landing 357 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1861 320 FTE
NAT-TCR Moscow #029 20.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Westlake 20.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Springfield ALF 20.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Optimal US Logistics 20.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Anatometal LLC 87 FTE
NAT-SIZE Southwest Division 87 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pierce Pacific Manufacturing 87 FTE
NAT-SIZE GROWMARK FS, a division of GROWMARK INC. 87 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.