Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · California

Brookdale Citrus Heights

Citrus Heights, CA · ~41 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
14.6
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Brookdale Citrus Heights runs at 384% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Brookdale Citrus Heights: 14.6 TCR = 384% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Brookdale Citrus Heights safety composite

Brookdale Citrus Heights scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 13%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

47/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 14.61 per 100 workers

Safer than 13% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.1

2017→2021

Brookdale Citrus Heights injury rate improved

Brookdale Citrus Heights's TCR fell 4.1 from 16.6 in 2017 to 12.6 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2017 at 16.6 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=16.6 · 2021=12.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Citrus Heights, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 14.6 · 384% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #496/635
  • PHOTO 1855-TXWAC2
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~41 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 1855-TXWAC2 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Brookdale Citrus Heights in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Brookdale Citrus Heights averages 14.6 TCR (384% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Brookdale Citrus Heights TCR series: 2017=16.6 · 2021=12.6 · BLS 3.8

Where Brookdale Citrus Heights falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 13% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #496 safest of 635 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in California.

Brookdale Citrus Heights (41 employees, TCR 14.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Brookdale Citrus Heights
Brookdale Citrus Heights (41 employees, TCR 14.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Brookdale Citrus Heights has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 12.6 0.0 3 0 0
2017 16.6 2.4 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · CA · Citrus Heights

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 65 employers in Citrus Heights, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 1855-TXWAC2 14.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR MBK - Estancia Del Sol 14.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR York, Elmcroft of 14.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Oswego Place Assisted Living Community LLC 14.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE CAL-O ORGANIC FARMING ADMINISTRATION 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sun Pacific Farming | Citrus Farming | Lindsay 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sun Pacific Farming | Citrus Farming | IEW Enterprise 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE George Jackson Farms, Inc. 41 FTE
CITY-NEAR On My Own Independent Living Services - Citrus Heights 433 FTE
CITY-NEAR 3712 347 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 3712 330 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0771 - CITRUS HEIGHTS CA WHSE 278 FTE
NAT-TCR 2007-Ucpmc-Niagara St Icf 14.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 6400-SWY-0019-0019-01653 14.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 4054-ABS-0019-0018-00571 14.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Quaker Windows and Doors Wood Plant 14.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE H Window Co. Inc. 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE Nestle Purina Pet Care 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE S03905 - Fort Wayne Hauling 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE Midwest Refrigerated Madison (Terminal), LLC 41 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.