Bonded warehousing, refrigerated · Wisconsin

Midwest Refrigerated Madison (Terminal), LLC

Mcfarland, WI · ~41 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
2.4
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Midwest Refrigerated Madison (Terminal), LLC runs at 42% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Bonded warehousing, refrigerated workplace, earning a grade A.

Midwest Refrigerated Madison (Terminal), LLC: 2.4 TCR = 42% of Bonded warehousing, refrigerated BLS 5.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Midwest Refrigerated Madison (Terminal), LLC safety composite

Midwest Refrigerated Madison (Terminal), LLC scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 88% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

73/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.42 per 100 workers

Safer than 74% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 88% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.9

2016→2021

Midwest Refrigerated Madison (Terminal), LLC injury rate improved

Midwest Refrigerated Madison (Terminal), LLC's TCR fell 5.9 from 5.9 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2016 at 5.9 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=5.9 · 2017=2.8 · 2018=2.8 · 2019=3.1 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493120 · Mcfarland, WI AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 2.4 · 42% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #13/32
  • PHOTO WM 6095
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~41 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: WM 6095 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Midwest Refrigerated Madison (Terminal), LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Midwest Refrigerated Madison (Terminal), LLC averages 2.4 TCR (42% of the Bonded warehousing, refrigerated BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Midwest Refrigerated Madison (Terminal), LLC TCR series: 2016=5.9 · 2017=2.8 · 2018=2.8 · 2019=3.1 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · BLS 5.8

Where Midwest Refrigerated Madison (Terminal), LLC falls in its industry

1,039 Bonded warehousing, refrigerat establishments

Safer than 74% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #13 safest of 32 Bonded warehousing, refrigerat employers in Wisconsin.

Midwest Refrigerated Madison (Terminal), LLC (41 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 68 employees and a TCR of 3.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Midwest Refrigerated Madison (Terminal), LLC
Midwest Refrigerated Madison (Terminal), LLC (41 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 68 employees and a TCR of 3.9

Midwest Refrigerated Madison (Terminal), LLC has fewer employees than the Bonded warehousing, refrigerated median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 3.1 0.0 1 0 0
2018 2.8 0.0 1 0 0
2017 2.8 2.8 1 0 0
2016 5.9 2.9 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493120 · WI · Mcfarland

1,039 Bonded warehousing, refrigerated employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 17 employers in Mcfarland, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR WM 6095 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Smithfield Foods - Edwardsville DC 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR USCS- Turlock, CA 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Laredo II 2.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE SunVest Solar LLC 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mineral Point Operations Bldg 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE CMC Construction Inc. - Ashland, WI 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bilfinger - P&G Green Bay 41 FTE
CITY-NEAR Henkels & McCoy, Wisconsin - McFarland 223 FTE
CITY-NEAR Perfect Puzzle LLC 116 FTE
CITY-NEAR 534-00394 103 FTE
CITY-NEAR KS Energy Services (Madison) 61 FTE
NAT-TCR Borders - Laredo 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Eagle Transport Corporation - Richmond 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Thomas J. Kempton Jr., Inc. 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Mills 2.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Chemical Distributors, Incorporated 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE Twin Valley Coffee 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE Nestle Purina Pet Care 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE S03905 - Fort Wayne Hauling 41 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.