Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · North Carolina

Brookdale Eden

Eden, NC · ~28 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.6
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Brookdale Eden runs at 174% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

Brookdale Eden: 6.6 TCR = 174% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Brookdale Eden safety composite

Brookdale Eden scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 67% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

58/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 6.61 per 100 workers

Safer than 55% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.04 per 100 workers

Safer than 67% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Brookdale Eden held a steady TCR band

Brookdale Eden's TCR held near 0.1 from 0.0 in 2018 to 0.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 18.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.01× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=0.0 · 2019=9.0 · 2020=9.0 · 2021=4.6 · 2022=4.6 · 2023=18.9 · 2024=0.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Eden, NC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 6.6 · 174% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #203/356
  • PHOTO Canoe Brook BA, LLC
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~28 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Canoe Brook BA, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Brookdale Eden in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Brookdale Eden averages 6.6 TCR (174% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Brookdale Eden TCR series: 2018=0 · 2019=9 · 2020=9 · 2021=4.6 · 2022=4.6 · 2023=18.9 · 2024=0.1 · BLS 3.8

Where Brookdale Eden falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 55% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #203 safest of 356 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in North Carolina.

Brookdale Eden (28 employees, TCR 6.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Brookdale Eden
Brookdale Eden (28 employees, TCR 6.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Brookdale Eden has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.1 0.0 2 0 0
2023 18.9 14.2 3 1 0
2022 4.6 4.6 1 0 0
2021 4.6 0.0 1 0 0
2020 9.0 4.5 2 0 0
2019 9.0 4.5 2 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · NC · Eden

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 39 employers in Eden, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Canoe Brook BA, LLC 6.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Azura Oak Creek 6.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Meridian At Waterways 6.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Edgewood Heights 6.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE H & D Farms, Inc. 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE SMITH FARMS 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Michael Morris Farms 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Elkin Hatchery 28 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gildan Charleston Inc: Eden DC 489 FTE
CITY-NEAR UNC Rockingham Health Care, Inc 489 FTE
CITY-NEAR UNC Rockingham Healthcare, Inc 321 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nestle Purina Petcare - Eden, NC 284 FTE
NAT-TCR 8010120 Johnsonville Sausage Sheboygan Falls 6.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Canoe Brook BA, LLC 6.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Akdeniz Chemson 6.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Guy Chemical Company, LLC 6.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Colorado Stone Quarries 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE El Paso TX Truss 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Grand Junction CO Truss 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Jack Hilliard Distributing Co., Inc Garland 28 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.