Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · New York

Brookdale Ithaca

Ithaca, NY · ~35 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
4.5
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Brookdale Ithaca runs at 119% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade C.

Brookdale Ithaca: 4.5 TCR = 119% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Brookdale Ithaca safety composite

Brookdale Ithaca scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 72% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 36%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

54/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 4.54 per 100 workers

Safer than 72% of industry peers

DART rate
D 5.1 per 100 workers

Safer than 36% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Brookdale Ithaca: 0.2 → 7.7 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 15.9 TCR · DART/TCR 1.12× in 2024

Brookdale Ithaca's TCR rose 7.5 from 0.2 in 2016 to 7.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 15.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.12× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Ithaca, NY ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 4.5 · 119% of ind

  • DART 5.1 DART
  • RANK #96/283
  • PHOTO Port Orange AL Care …
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 16 inj
  • SIZE ~35 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Port Orange AL Care Properties, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Brookdale Ithaca in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Brookdale Ithaca averages 4.5 TCR (119% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Brookdale Ithaca TCR series: 2016=0.2 · 2018=15.9 · 2020=0.1 · 2021=0 · 2023=3.3 · 2024=7.7 · BLS 3.8

Where Brookdale Ithaca falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 72% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #96 safest of 283 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in New York.

Brookdale Ithaca (35 employees, TCR 4.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Brookdale Ithaca
Brookdale Ithaca (35 employees, TCR 4.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Brookdale Ithaca has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 7.7 5.1 3 0 0
2023 3.3 0.0 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.1 0.0 3 0 0
2018 15.9 0.0 4 0 0
2016 0.2 0.1 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · NY · Ithaca

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 119 employers in Ithaca, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Port Orange AL Care Properties, LLC 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Orofino Retirement Properties, Inc. dba Brookside Landing 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Highland Cove Retirement Community 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Arbor at Bend 4.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Sandy Knoll Farms, Inc. 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE NY State Solar Farmingdale 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Morgan Facilities 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE RICHTER+RATNER CONTRACTING CORP 35 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cayuga Medical Center 1,595 FTE
CITY-NEAR BorgWarner Ithaca LLC 1,206 FTE
CITY-NEAR Signworks 1,007 FTE
CITY-NEAR Audiology 990 FTE
NAT-TCR GlobalRehab - Fort Worth, LP (d/b/a Baylor Scott & White Institute for Rehabilitation - Fort Worth) 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 062/Las Vegas 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Gallagher Uniform 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Propane 4.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Discover Fin Svcs Riverwoods 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Store 004 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Store 080 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Loudspeaker Components 35 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2021, 2020, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.