Industrial uniform supply services · Michigan

Gallagher Uniform

Battle Creek, MI · ~73 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
4.5
Avg TCR
2.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Gallagher Uniform runs at 216% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Industrial uniform supply services workplace, earning a grade F.

Gallagher Uniform: 4.5 TCR = 216% of Industrial uniform supply services BLS 2.1 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Gallagher Uniform safety composite

Gallagher Uniform scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 32%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

55/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.54 per 100 workers

Safer than 32% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−13.3

2016→2024

Gallagher Uniform injury rate improved

Gallagher Uniform's TCR fell 13.3 from 13.3 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 13.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=13.3 · 2018=4.2 · 2019=2.8 · 2020=4.4 · 2021=5.7 · 2022=1.2 · 2023=4.7 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 812332 · Battle Creek, MI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 4.5 · 216% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #19/26
  • PHOTO 065H - BANGOR ME
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 26 inj
  • SIZE ~73 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 065H - BANGOR ME (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Gallagher Uniform in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Gallagher Uniform averages 4.5 TCR (216% of the Industrial uniform supply services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Gallagher Uniform TCR series: 2016=13.3 · 2018=4.2 · 2019=2.8 · 2020=4.4 · 2021=5.7 · 2022=1.2 · 2023=4.7 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.1

Where Gallagher Uniform falls in its industry

917 Industrial uniform supply serv establishments

Safer than 32% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #19 safest of 26 Industrial uniform supply serv employers in Michigan.

Gallagher Uniform (73 employees, TCR 4.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 82 employees and a TCR of 3.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Gallagher Uniform
Gallagher Uniform (73 employees, TCR 4.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 82 employees and a TCR of 3.1

Gallagher Uniform has fewer employees than the Industrial uniform supply services median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 4.7 4.7 4 0 0
2022 1.2 1.2 1 0 0
2021 5.7 5.7 4 0 0
2020 4.4 2.9 3 0 0
2019 2.8 1.4 2 0 0
2018 4.2 2.8 3 0 0
2016 13.3 8.9 9 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

812332 · MI · Battle Creek

917 Industrial uniform supply services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 161 employers in Battle Creek, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 065H - BANGOR ME 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR HOUSTON TX - 814 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR PITTSBURGH, PA - 074 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR 045M - DULUTH MN RNTL 4.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Field Work 73 FTE
STATE-SIZE Michiana SC 73 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tri-County Electric- Portland 73 FTE
STATE-SIZE Midwest Powerline, LLC 73 FTE
CITY-NEAR Denso Manufacturing of Michigan 2,702 FTE
CITY-NEAR BRONSON BATTLE CREEK 1,530 FTE
CITY-NEAR Battle Creek HQ Corporate Office 1,118 FTE
CITY-NEAR I I Stanley Co., Inc. 729 FTE
NAT-TCR Opportunity Center Administration 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Airline Drive Store 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR GlobalRehab - Fort Worth, LP (d/b/a Baylor Scott & White Institute for Rehabilitation - Fort Worth) 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Brookdale Ithaca 4.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Korrect Plumbing, Heating and Air Conditioning, Inc. 73 FTE
NAT-SIZE sl acquisition company, llc dba superior landscapes 73 FTE
NAT-SIZE Trader Joe's 0682 Northbrook 73 FTE
NAT-SIZE Trader Joe's 0637 Media 73 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.