Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Wisconsin

Brookdale La Crosse Memory Care

La Crosse, WI · ~42 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.8
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Brookdale La Crosse Memory Care runs at 205% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Brookdale La Crosse Memory Care: 7.8 TCR = 205% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Brookdale La Crosse Memory Care safety composite

Brookdale La Crosse Memory Care scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 20%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

38/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 7.79 per 100 workers

Safer than 46% of industry peers

DART rate
F 8.27 per 100 workers

Safer than 20% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Brookdale La Crosse Memory Care: 7.2 → 8.3 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 8.3 TCR · DART/TCR 1.06× in 2018

Brookdale La Crosse Memory Care's TCR rose 1.1 from 7.2 in 2016 to 8.3 in 2018. In 2018, DART was 1.06× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · La Crosse, WI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 7.8 · 205% of ind

  • DART 8.3 DART
  • RANK #183/273
  • PHOTO Elmhurst Commons Ass…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~42 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Elmhurst Commons Assisted Living (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Brookdale La Crosse Memory Care in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Brookdale La Crosse Memory Care averages 7.8 TCR (205% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Brookdale La Crosse Memory Care TCR series: 2016=7.2 · 2017=7.9 · 2018=8.3 · BLS 3.8

Where Brookdale La Crosse Memory Care falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 46% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #183 safest of 273 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Wisconsin.

Brookdale La Crosse Memory Care (42 employees, TCR 7.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Brookdale La Crosse Memory Care
Brookdale La Crosse Memory Care (42 employees, TCR 7.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Brookdale La Crosse Memory Care has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 8.3 8.3 2 0 0
2017 7.9 7.9 2 0 0
2016 7.2 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · WI · La Crosse

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 188 employers in La Crosse, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Elmhurst Commons Assisted Living 7.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR ABBY CONWAY LLC 7.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Bungalows at Chesterfield Village 7.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cherry Wood Pointe Asst Lv 7.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Port Washington Generating Station 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sterling Water, Inc 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE Roberts Irrigation Co 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bielinski Homes 42 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gundersen Lutheran Medical Center 3,712 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mayo Clinic Health System-Franciscan Healthcare Inc 2,329 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gundersen Clinic, Ltd. 2,127 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gundersen - La Crosse Clinic 1,739 FTE
NAT-TCR Avon Location #02 7.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Spectrum America 998 7.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Oelwein Iowa 7.8 TCR
NAT-TCR APL Valencia 7.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE 24JR 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cstk Okc 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE USF Fairburn GA 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE Corpus Christi North Beach Terminal 42 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.