Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · North Carolina

Brookdale Lexington AL/MC (NC)

Lexington, NC · ~42 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.6
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Brookdale Lexington AL/MC (NC) runs at 174% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

Brookdale Lexington AL/MC (NC): 6.6 TCR = 174% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Brookdale Lexington AL/MC (NC) safety composite

Brookdale Lexington AL/MC (NC) scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 53% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 29%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

44/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 6.62 per 100 workers

Safer than 53% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.14 per 100 workers

Safer than 29% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.9

2016→2022

Brookdale Lexington AL/MC (NC) injury rate improved

Brookdale Lexington AL/MC (NC)'s TCR fell 1.9 from 8.1 in 2016 to 6.1 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2016 at 8.1 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.93× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=8.1 · 2017=5.6 · 2022=6.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Lexington, NC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 6.6 · 174% of ind

  • DART 6.1 DART
  • RANK #65/105
  • PHOTO Peregrine Senior Liv…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~42 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Peregrine Senior Living at Cheektowaga (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Brookdale Lexington AL/MC (NC) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Brookdale Lexington AL/MC (NC) averages 6.6 TCR (174% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Brookdale Lexington AL/MC (NC) TCR series: 2016=8.1 · 2017=5.6 · 2022=6.1 · BLS 3.8

Where Brookdale Lexington AL/MC (NC) falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 53% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #65 safest of 105 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in North Carolina.

Brookdale Lexington AL/MC (NC) (42 employees, TCR 6.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Brookdale Lexington AL/MC (NC)
Brookdale Lexington AL/MC (NC) (42 employees, TCR 6.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Brookdale Lexington AL/MC (NC) has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 6.1 6.1 2 0 0
2017 5.6 0.0 2 0 0
2016 8.1 0.0 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · NC · Lexington

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 120 employers in Lexington, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Peregrine Senior Living at Cheektowaga 6.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Presence Heritage Meadowview Lodge Estates / Day Break 6.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Laurel Parc 6.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR PATHFINDER PLACE 6.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Mount Vernon Hatchery 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE CPI USA NC LLC - Southport 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE ALBEMARLE-WMSTN 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE Franklin Operations Center 42 FTE
CITY-NEAR Davidson County Schools 3,351 FTE
CITY-NEAR Davidson County Government 1,237 FTE
CITY-NEAR Atrium Windows & Door 910 FTE
CITY-NEAR ASCO Power Technologies 639 FTE
NAT-TCR 053/FLATIRON 6.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Citrus memorial Hospital 6.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Uwgb Retail 6.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Riverside Village 6.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Section 10 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lakeshore Assisted Living and Memory Care 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE Betenbough Homes - Home Office 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE TMS Portage 42 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.