Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · New York

Peregrine Senior Living at Cheektowaga

Cheektowaga, NY · ~93 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.6
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Peregrine Senior Living at Cheektowaga runs at 174% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

Peregrine Senior Living at Cheektowaga: 6.6 TCR = 174% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Peregrine Senior Living at Cheektowaga safety composite

Peregrine Senior Living at Cheektowaga scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 53% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 41%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

48/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 6.62 per 100 workers

Safer than 53% of industry peers

DART rate
D 4.45 per 100 workers

Safer than 41% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.3

2022→2024

Peregrine Senior Living at Cheektowaga injury rate improved

Peregrine Senior Living at Cheektowaga's TCR fell 1.3 from 7.3 in 2022 to 5.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 7.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.67× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=7.3 · 2024=5.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Cheektowaga, NY ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 6.6 · 174% of ind

  • DART 4.5 DART
  • RANK #54/98
  • PHOTO Brookdale Lexington …
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~93 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Brookdale Lexington AL/MC (NC) (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Peregrine Senior Living at Cheektowaga in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Peregrine Senior Living at Cheektowaga averages 6.6 TCR (174% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Peregrine Senior Living at Cheektowaga TCR series: 2022=7.3 · 2024=5.9 · BLS 3.8

Where Peregrine Senior Living at Cheektowaga falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 53% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #54 safest of 98 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in New York.

Peregrine Senior Living at Cheektowaga (93 employees, TCR 6.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Peregrine Senior Living at Cheektowaga
Peregrine Senior Living at Cheektowaga (93 employees, TCR 6.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Peregrine Senior Living at Cheektowaga has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.9 4.5 4 0 0
2022 7.3 1.5 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · NY · Cheektowaga

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 150 employers in Cheektowaga, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Lexington AL/MC (NC) 6.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Presence Heritage Meadowview Lodge Estates / Day Break 6.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Laurel Parc 6.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR PATHFINDER PLACE 6.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Purcell construction corperation 93 FTE
STATE-SIZE Weydman Electric Inc. 93 FTE
STATE-SIZE 1095 East 45th St 93 FTE
STATE-SIZE Eastern Heating And Cooling 93 FTE
CITY-NEAR Office of Field Operations - Buffalo 1,643 FTE
CITY-NEAR Health Force 548 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sisters of Charity Hospital, St. Joseph Campus 457 FTE
CITY-NEAR Visiting Nurses Association - Erie 407 FTE
NAT-TCR Wellington Power Corporation 6.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Beltservice - Earth City 6.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Noah Project, Inc. 6.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Richmond 6.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Ignite Medical Resort Bartlesville LLC 93 FTE
NAT-SIZE Porter's Tire Store 93 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cumberland County ABC Board 93 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rosemount Elementary School 93 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.