Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Florida

Brookdale Mandarin Central

Jacksonville, FL · ~40 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.5
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Brookdale Mandarin Central runs at 14% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade A.

Brookdale Mandarin Central: 0.5 TCR = 14% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Brookdale Mandarin Central safety composite

Brookdale Mandarin Central scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 99% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

82/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.53 per 100 workers

Safer than 99% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Brookdale Mandarin Central held a steady TCR band

Brookdale Mandarin Central's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 4.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=4.2 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Jacksonville, FL AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.5 · 14% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #5/396
  • PHOTO Cartmell Communities…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~40 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Cartmell Communities, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Brookdale Mandarin Central in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Brookdale Mandarin Central averages 0.5 TCR (14% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Brookdale Mandarin Central TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=4.2 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Brookdale Mandarin Central falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 99% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 396 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Florida.

Brookdale Mandarin Central (40 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Brookdale Mandarin Central
Brookdale Mandarin Central (40 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Brookdale Mandarin Central has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 4.2 4.2 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · FL · Jacksonville

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 1,776 employers in Jacksonville, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Cartmell Communities, Inc. 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Artis Senior Living of Huntingdon Valley 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR AlmaVia Of San Francisco (AVSF) 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Colfax Health and Rehabilitation Center 0.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Triple D Farm 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE IMG Citrus Happy Food 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE Village farms Heathrow Florida 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE The Villages Grown Farm 40 FTE
CITY-NEAR UF HEALTH JACKSONVILLE 4,948 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mayo Clinic Jacksonville (Clinic) 4,567 FTE
CITY-NEAR Baptist Health System Jacksonville Baptist Medical Center 4,199 FTE
CITY-NEAR FLJAC - JACKSONVILLE 4,193 FTE
NAT-TCR Corporate 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Lifetime Brands Medford 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR NY22101 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Tundra Restaurant Supply, LLC 0.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE HGI Wilmington Mayfaire 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE Carnegie Mellon Oh 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE Liberty- Templeton 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE Panth Mgmt 40 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.