623312 Assisted Living Facilities for the Elderly · Massachusetts

Laurentide at Mashpee Commons

Burlington, MA · ~58 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.5
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Laurentide at Mashpee Commons runs at 13% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical 623312 Assisted Living Facilities for the Elderly workplace, earning a grade A.

Laurentide at Mashpee Commons: 0.5 TCR = 13% of 623312 Assisted Living Facilities for the Elderly BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Laurentide at Mashpee Commons safety composite

Laurentide at Mashpee Commons scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

82/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.51 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Laurentide at Mashpee Commons held a steady TCR band

Laurentide at Mashpee Commons's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2019 at 2.0 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=2.0 · 2020=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Burlington, MA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.5 · 13% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/210
  • PHOTO AlmaVia Of San Franc…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~58 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: AlmaVia Of San Francisco (AVSF) (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Massachusetts employers → · Look up another →

Laurentide at Mashpee Commons in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Laurentide at Mashpee Commons averages 0.5 TCR (13% of the 623312 Assisted Living Facilities for the Elderly BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Laurentide at Mashpee Commons TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=2 · 2020=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Laurentide at Mashpee Commons falls in its industry

6,510 623312 Assisted Living Facilit establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Massachusetts alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 210 623312 Assisted Living Facilit employers in Massachusetts.

Laurentide at Mashpee Commons (58 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Laurentide at Mashpee Commons
Laurentide at Mashpee Commons (58 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Laurentide at Mashpee Commons has more employees than the 623312 Assisted Living Facilities for th median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 2.0 2.0 0 1 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · MA · Burlington

6,510 623312 Assisted Living Facilities for the Elderly employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,108 rated employers in Massachusetts with headcount on file · 89 employers in Burlington, MA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR AlmaVia Of San Francisco (AVSF) 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Colfax Health and Rehabilitation Center 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cartmell Communities, Inc. 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Mandarin Central 0.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE FirstLight Power Resources - Northfield Mountain/NERC 58 FTE
STATE-SIZE Liberty Utilities Charles Street 58 FTE
STATE-SIZE Eversource - Somerville Gas 58 FTE
STATE-SIZE Elkins 58 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lahey Hospital and Medical Center 4,493 FTE
CITY-NEAR Burlington, MA 4,399 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lahey Medical Center 4,286 FTE
CITY-NEAR EMD Millipore Corporation - 400 Summit 838 FTE
NAT-TCR International Paper Stockton Litho 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Acuity Brands Lighting NEDC 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Pfizer Inc 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Breeder / Broiler Department 0.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE O&M Gulf Coast 58 FTE
NAT-SIZE Parsec Jax FEC 58 FTE
NAT-SIZE Watrous Nursing Center 58 FTE
NAT-SIZE FRHC - Palouse 58 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.