Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Minnesota

Brookdale Mankato

Mankato, MN · ~22 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.7
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Brookdale Mankato runs at 72% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade B.

Brookdale Mankato: 2.7 TCR = 72% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Brookdale Mankato safety composite

Brookdale Mankato scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 87% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

77/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 2.73 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.6

2017→2021

Brookdale Mankato injury rate improved

Brookdale Mankato's TCR fell 6.6 from 6.6 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2020 at 7.0 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=6.6 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=7.0 · 2021=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Mankato, MN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.7 · 72% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #36/240
  • PHOTO Brookdale East Wichita
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~22 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Brookdale East Wichita (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Brookdale Mankato in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Brookdale Mankato averages 2.7 TCR (72% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Brookdale Mankato TCR series: 2017=6.6 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=7 · 2021=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Brookdale Mankato falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 87% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #36 safest of 240 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Minnesota.

Brookdale Mankato (22 employees, TCR 2.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Brookdale Mankato
Brookdale Mankato (22 employees, TCR 2.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Brookdale Mankato has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 7.0 7.0 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 6.6 6.6 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · MN · Mankato

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 214 employers in Mankato, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Brookdale East Wichita 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Atrium at Liberty Park 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR 62058 BRIGHTON GARDENS OF RALEIGH 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wickshire Poland 2.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Sunrise Dairy 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Emerald Spring Dairy, Inc. 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Silverstreak Dairy LLC, Greenstreak Dairy 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dassel 22 FTE
CITY-NEAR Minnesota State University, Mankato 2,729 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mayo Clinic Health System-Mankato 2,468 FTE
CITY-NEAR MRCI - Premier Drive 1,641 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mankato Area Public Schools 1,200 FTE
NAT-TCR Old Lyme Town Hall 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR EnvirOx, LLC 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Halifax County Adult Detention Center 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Excela Health Home Care & Hospice 2.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Zenith - Newton 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Perko's Cafe and Grill #132 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Central Valley Casework Inc 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Homewood Suites Milwaukee Downtown 22 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.