Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Virginia

Brookdale Midlothian

Midlothian, VA · ~60 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
12.5
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Brookdale Midlothian runs at 330% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Brookdale Midlothian: 12.5 TCR = 330% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Brookdale Midlothian safety composite

Brookdale Midlothian scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 14%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

25/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 12.53 per 100 workers

Safer than 19% of industry peers

DART rate
F 10.64 per 100 workers

Safer than 14% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.1

2016→2024

Brookdale Midlothian injury rate improved

Brookdale Midlothian's TCR fell 6.1 from 16.8 in 2016 to 10.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 25.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.85× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=16.8 · 2017=23.2 · 2018=9.8 · 2019=25.2 · 2020=8.3 · 2021=9.4 · 2022=5.4 · 2023=3.9 · 2024=10.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Midlothian, VA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 12.5 · 330% of ind

  • DART 10.6 DART
  • RANK #151/199
  • PHOTO Jewish Home-Elan
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 48 inj
  • SIZE ~60 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Jewish Home-Elan (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Virginia employers → · Look up another →

Brookdale Midlothian in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Brookdale Midlothian averages 12.5 TCR (330% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Brookdale Midlothian TCR series: 2016=16.8 · 2017=23.2 · 2018=9.8 · 2019=25.2 · 2020=8.3 · 2021=9.4 · 2022=5.4 · 2023=3.9 · 2024=10.6 · BLS 3.8

Where Brookdale Midlothian falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 19% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Virginia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #151 safest of 199 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Virginia.

Brookdale Midlothian (60 employees, TCR 12.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Brookdale Midlothian
Brookdale Midlothian (60 employees, TCR 12.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Brookdale Midlothian has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 10.6 10.6 5 0 0
2023 3.9 2.0 2 0 0
2022 5.4 1.8 3 0 0
2021 9.4 9.4 5 0 0
2020 8.3 4.2 4 0 0
2019 25.2 10.5 12 0 0
2018 9.8 7.4 4 0 0
2017 23.2 5.8 7 1 0
2016 16.8 8.4 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · VA · Midlothian

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,673 rated employers in Virginia with headcount on file · 131 employers in Midlothian, VA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Jewish Home-Elan 12.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR B-X Meriden LLC 12.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lincoln Court 12.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Anthology of Grayslake 12.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE 324-NiSource-Suffolk VA-Op Ctr 60 FTE
STATE-SIZE Coleman-Adams Construction, Inc 60 FTE
STATE-SIZE Powell's Creek Solar Farm 60 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fire & Life Safety America Tidewater 60 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Francis Medical Center 1,237 FTE
CITY-NEAR Power Services : PS FS North America 855 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bon Secours St Francis Medical Center 700 FTE
CITY-NEAR ODI-RIC 492 FTE
NAT-TCR 162 Countryside 12.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 311 Rancho Cordova 12.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Residence Inn Las Vegas Convention Center 12.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 540 Ctv85 12.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Gutknecht Construction Company 60 FTE
NAT-SIZE Jerl Machine Inc. 60 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rock Prairie Dairy LLC 60 FTE
NAT-SIZE River View Farms Inc 60 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.