Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Iowa

SunnyBrook of Ft. Madison

Fort Madison, IA · ~36 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
12.5
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

SunnyBrook of Ft. Madison runs at 330% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

SunnyBrook of Ft. Madison: 12.5 TCR = 330% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

SunnyBrook of Ft. Madison safety composite

SunnyBrook of Ft. Madison scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 19%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

50/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 12.54 per 100 workers

Safer than 19% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−250.0

2016→2020

SunnyBrook of Ft. Madison injury rate improved

SunnyBrook of Ft. Madison's TCR fell 250.0 from 250.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2016 at 250.0 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=250.0 · 2017=7.9 · 2018=8.3 · 2019=34.0 · 2020=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Fort Madison, IA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 12.5 · 330% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #60/70
  • PHOTO Lincoln Court
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~36 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Lincoln Court (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Iowa employers → · Look up another →

SunnyBrook of Ft. Madison in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows SunnyBrook of Ft. Madison averages 12.5 TCR (330% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

SunnyBrook of Ft. Madison TCR series: 2016=250 · 2017=7.9 · 2018=8.3 · 2019=34 · 2020=0 · BLS 3.8

Where SunnyBrook of Ft. Madison falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 19% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Iowa alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #60 safest of 70 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Iowa.

SunnyBrook of Ft. Madison (36 employees, TCR 12.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate SunnyBrook of Ft. Madison
SunnyBrook of Ft. Madison (36 employees, TCR 12.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

SunnyBrook of Ft. Madison has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 34.0 17.0 2 0 0
2018 8.3 8.3 2 0 0
2017 7.9 0.0 2 0 0
2016 250.0 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · IA · Fort Madison

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,192 rated employers in Iowa with headcount on file · 32 employers in Fort Madison, IA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Lincoln Court 12.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Anthology of Grayslake 12.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Midlothian 12.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Jewish Home-Elan 12.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE ALGONA MARKET SWINE MANAGEMENT 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Butler County Rural Electric Cooperative 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Algona Municipal Utilities 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Waterloo Water Works 36 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fort Madison, IA 554 FTE
CITY-NEAR Iowa State Penitentiary 486 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fort Madison Community Hospital 428 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Scotts Company - Fort Madison 325 FTE
NAT-TCR Joseph Companies (IQHC) Neillsville 12.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Woodford Logistics 12.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Tifton Health and Rehabilitation Center 12.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Industrial Opportunities 12.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE OEM Tube Assemblies - Chipley FL 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE TERRIO Physical Therapy & Fitness - Memorial 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Terminal 7 (Berths A, B and C) - Autos and RoRo 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE UVA Medical Center Orange 36 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.