Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Texas

Brookdale Oakwell

San Antonio, TX · ~40 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.8
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Brookdale Oakwell runs at 257% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Brookdale Oakwell: 9.8 TCR = 257% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Brookdale Oakwell safety composite

Brookdale Oakwell scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 32%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

43/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.78 per 100 workers

Safer than 32% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.16 per 100 workers

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−7.3

2016→2022

Brookdale Oakwell injury rate improved

Brookdale Oakwell's TCR fell 7.3 from 13.6 in 2016 to 6.3 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2016 at 13.6 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.32× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=13.6 · 2017=8.3 · 2018=12.9 · 2020=5.0 · 2021=12.5 · 2022=6.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · San Antonio, TX ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 9.8 · 257% of ind

  • DART 3.2 DART
  • RANK #342/470
  • PHOTO Bridges by Epoch at …
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 21 inj
  • SIZE ~40 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Bridges by Epoch at Nashua (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Brookdale Oakwell in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Brookdale Oakwell averages 9.8 TCR (257% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Brookdale Oakwell TCR series: 2016=13.6 · 2017=8.3 · 2018=12.9 · 2020=5 · 2021=12.5 · 2022=6.3 · BLS 3.8

Where Brookdale Oakwell falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 32% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #342 safest of 470 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Texas.

Brookdale Oakwell (40 employees, TCR 9.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Brookdale Oakwell
Brookdale Oakwell (40 employees, TCR 9.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Brookdale Oakwell has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 6.3 3.2 2 0 0
2021 12.5 12.5 4 0 0
2020 5.0 5.0 2 0 0
2018 12.9 12.9 5 0 0
2017 8.3 8.3 3 0 0
2016 13.6 8.2 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · TX · San Antonio

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 2,207 employers in San Antonio, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Bridges by Epoch at Nashua 9.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR KRE-BSL HUSKY DANVERS OPERATIONS LLC 9.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Forum at Desert Harbor 9.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Artis Senior Living of Woodbury 9.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE RCB Ventures, LLC dba Tri-Tex Grass 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cook Canyon Ranch 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE Frontier Feedyard 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kurten Location 40 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bexar County Hospital District 8,703 FTE
CITY-NEAR Legend Oaks Health & Rehabilitation West San Antonio 6,953 FTE
CITY-NEAR ISS Facility Services Inc. 6,177 FTE
CITY-NEAR Buena Vida of San Antonio 5,262 FTE
NAT-TCR Greybull Hardware 9.8 TCR
NAT-TCR CBI Punta Gorda DC 9.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Trego/Dugan Aviation Inc Gri 9.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Superior Grocers #102 9.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE 4028-ARW18 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wurth Adams Richfield 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE 44917 - Pompano Beach Bulk 24 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE Millers Merry Manor 40 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.