Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · North Carolina

Brookdale Reidsville

Reidsville, NC · ~38 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.7
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Brookdale Reidsville runs at 230% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Brookdale Reidsville: 8.7 TCR = 230% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Brookdale Reidsville safety composite

Brookdale Reidsville scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 39%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

58/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 8.73 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−11.7

2016→2024

Brookdale Reidsville injury rate improved

Brookdale Reidsville's TCR fell 11.7 from 11.7 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 14.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=11.7 · 2017=14.2 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=9.3 · 2020=12.4 · 2021=9.4 · 2022=12.7 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Reidsville, NC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 8.7 · 230% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #258/356
  • PHOTO Heights Crossing
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 23 inj
  • SIZE ~38 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Heights Crossing (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Brookdale Reidsville in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Brookdale Reidsville averages 8.7 TCR (230% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Brookdale Reidsville TCR series: 2016=11.7 · 2017=14.2 · 2018=0 · 2019=9.3 · 2020=12.4 · 2021=9.4 · 2022=12.7 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Brookdale Reidsville falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 39% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #258 safest of 356 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in North Carolina.

Brookdale Reidsville (38 employees, TCR 8.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Brookdale Reidsville
Brookdale Reidsville (38 employees, TCR 8.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Brookdale Reidsville has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 12.7 12.7 4 0 0
2021 9.4 9.4 3 0 0
2020 12.4 0.0 4 0 0
2019 9.3 6.2 3 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 14.2 11.4 5 0 0
2016 11.7 8.7 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · NC · Reidsville

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 60 employers in Reidsville, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Heights Crossing 8.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR MCAP East Paris Opco, LLC d/b/a Commonwealth Senior Living at East Paris 8.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR 10493 8.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Symphony Square 8.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Morganton Hatchery 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Harris Energy & Environmental Center 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Enerdyne Power Systems, Inc 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Electric Utilities (8100) 38 FTE
CITY-NEAR De Oro Foods, DBA Dorada Foods, LLC 438 FTE
CITY-NEAR Dorada Foods Reidsville 400 FTE
CITY-NEAR Henniges Automotive 307 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 3304 301 FTE
NAT-TCR Missouri Thistle Inc. 8.7 TCR
NAT-TCR NTension Corp 8.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Harry J. Lawall and Son - Langhorne 8.7 TCR
NAT-TCR CB2 San Diego #073 8.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Surbo Tubular Services, Inc 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Friendship Trap Company 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE T D Beck Trucking LLC 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Komatsu America Corp. 38 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.