Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · California

Montecito Senior Living

Concord, CA · ~135 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.7
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Montecito Senior Living runs at 230% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Montecito Senior Living: 8.7 TCR = 230% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Montecito Senior Living safety composite

Montecito Senior Living scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 32%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

39/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 8.73 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.82 per 100 workers

Safer than 32% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Montecito Senior Living: 8.7 → 9966.8 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 9966.8 TCR · DART/TCR 152.22× in 2019

Montecito Senior Living's TCR rose 9958.1 from 8.7 in 2017 to 9966.8 in 2019. In 2019, DART was 152.22× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Concord, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 8.7 · 230% of ind

  • DART 1328.9 DART
  • RANK #287/635
  • PHOTO Heights Crossing
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 23 inj
  • SIZE ~135 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Heights Crossing (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Montecito Senior Living in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Montecito Senior Living averages 8.7 TCR (230% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-09-26

Montecito Senior Living TCR series: 2017=8.7 · 2019=9966.8 · BLS 3.8

Where Montecito Senior Living falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 39% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #287 safest of 635 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in California.

Montecito Senior Living (135 employees, TCR 8.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Montecito Senior Living
Montecito Senior Living (135 employees, TCR 8.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Montecito Senior Living has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 9966.8 1328.9 15 0 0
2017 8.7 5.8 8 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · CA · Concord

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 201 employers in Concord, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Heights Crossing 8.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR MCAP East Paris Opco, LLC d/b/a Commonwealth Senior Living at East Paris 8.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Welcome Home Management - Hills Crossing 8.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Reidsville 8.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Carlton Senior Living Downtown Pleasant Hill 135 FTE
STATE-SIZE The Avenues Transitional Care Center 135 FTE
STATE-SIZE 921 135 FTE
STATE-SIZE BICENTENNIAL_1354879 135 FTE
CITY-NEAR CA-01 4,525 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 403 2,891 FTE
CITY-NEAR AX9 Security Inc 1,725 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gonsalves and Santucci 1,551 FTE
NAT-TCR Palestine Healthcare Center 8.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Vertellus - Bayonne 8.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Frattallone's Ace Hardware-Burnsville 8.7 TCR
NAT-TCR EnerSys Tubing Plant 8.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE BLACKHAWK 135 FTE
NAT-SIZE Healthpark Hospice House 135 FTE
NAT-SIZE 289 - Monroeville 135 FTE
NAT-SIZE 285 - Cherry Hill 135 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.