Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Tennessee

Brookdale Rock Springs

Kingsport, TN · ~29 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.4
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Brookdale Rock Springs runs at 247% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Brookdale Rock Springs: 9.4 TCR = 247% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Brookdale Rock Springs safety composite

Brookdale Rock Springs scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 35%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

56/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 9.4 per 100 workers

Safer than 35% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−8.6

2016→2024

Brookdale Rock Springs injury rate improved

Brookdale Rock Springs's TCR fell 8.6 from 8.6 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 22.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=8.6 · 2017=16.1 · 2019=15.3 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=22.1 · 2022=4.2 · 2023=8.9 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Kingsport, TN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 9.4 · 247% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #76/100
  • PHOTO Brookdale Chanate
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 18 inj
  • SIZE ~29 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Brookdale Chanate (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Tennessee employers → · Look up another →

Brookdale Rock Springs in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Brookdale Rock Springs averages 9.4 TCR (247% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Brookdale Rock Springs TCR series: 2016=8.6 · 2017=16.1 · 2019=15.3 · 2020=0 · 2021=22.1 · 2022=4.2 · 2023=8.9 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Brookdale Rock Springs falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 35% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Tennessee alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #76 safest of 100 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Tennessee.

Brookdale Rock Springs (29 employees, TCR 9.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Brookdale Rock Springs
Brookdale Rock Springs (29 employees, TCR 9.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Brookdale Rock Springs has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 8.9 4.5 2 0 0
2022 4.2 4.2 1 0 0
2021 22.1 13.3 5 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 15.3 11.5 4 0 0
2017 16.1 16.1 4 0 0
2016 8.6 4.3 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · TN · Kingsport

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,743 rated employers in Tennessee with headcount on file · 152 employers in Kingsport, TN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Chanate 9.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ridgeway on German 9.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Covell Gardens 9.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Watermark at Logan Square 9.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Tosh Pork Crutchfield 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Waynes Fayetteville 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Brookfield Renewable - Brookfield Smoky Mountain Hydro 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE UCEMC Carthage 29 FTE
CITY-NEAR Eastman Kingsport Site 7,258 FTE
CITY-NEAR Holston Valley Medical Center 1,733 FTE
CITY-NEAR Eastman Chemical Company Kinsport TN- BSL 1,206 FTE
CITY-NEAR BLUE RIDGE MEDICAL MANAGEMENT CORPORATION - VA 1,073 FTE
NAT-TCR Superior Moving Services, Inc. 9.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Hudson Public Schools 9.4 TCR
NAT-TCR The Arc of the Quad Cities Area 9.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Performance Drywall 9.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Mercer Landmark - MPS 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Telamon Corporation - Bensalem 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Almond Tree Hulling Co. 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Brenden Gardens 29 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.