Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Florida

Brookdale Sarasota Midtown

Sarasota, FL · ~47 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.6
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Brookdale Sarasota Midtown runs at 41% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade A.

Brookdale Sarasota Midtown: 1.6 TCR = 41% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Brookdale Sarasota Midtown safety composite

Brookdale Sarasota Midtown scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 96% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

71/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 1.56 per 100 workers

Safer than 96% of industry peers

DART rate
C 2.39 per 100 workers

Safer than 58% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Brookdale Sarasota Midtown: 0.0 → 2.4 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 7.0 TCR · DART/TCR 1.53× in 2024

Brookdale Sarasota Midtown's TCR rose 2.4 from 0.0 in 2016 to 2.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 7.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.53× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Sarasota, FL AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.6 · 41% of ind

  • DART 2.4 DART
  • RANK #23/396
  • PHOTO The Retreat at Sunbr…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~47 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: The Retreat at Sunbrook (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Brookdale Sarasota Midtown in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Brookdale Sarasota Midtown averages 1.6 TCR (41% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Brookdale Sarasota Midtown TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=4.7 · 2023=7 · 2024=2.4 · BLS 3.8

Where Brookdale Sarasota Midtown falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 96% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #23 safest of 396 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Florida.

Brookdale Sarasota Midtown (47 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Brookdale Sarasota Midtown
Brookdale Sarasota Midtown (47 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Brookdale Sarasota Midtown has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.4 2.4 1 0 0
2023 7.0 7.0 3 0 0
2022 4.7 4.7 2 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · FL · Sarasota

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 504 employers in Sarasota, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR The Retreat at Sunbrook 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Hoffman Estates Golf Rd 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Phoenix at Opelika 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fillmore Country Club 1.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Wonderful Bees Florida 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Encino Harvesting, LLC 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE PLANT MARKETING LLC FLORIDA 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ft Myers Service Center 47 FTE
CITY-NEAR Beneva Lakes 3,238 FTE
CITY-NEAR Blue Butterfly- Lakewood Ranch 2,476 FTE
CITY-NEAR Connexis Physicians 2,476 FTE
CITY-NEAR Treasures Thrift Shop II 2,476 FTE
NAT-TCR Community Development 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Universidad Ana G. Mendez - Carolina 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Yarbs Grading and Paving, Inc. 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR LATHROP 1.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Bemidji Workforce Center 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Global Fab Inc. 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Perkiomen Motorcoach, LLC 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hoover Treated Wood Products - Milford 47 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.