Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Texas

Brookdale Sleepy Hollow

Amarillo, TX · ~38 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.4
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Brookdale Sleepy Hollow runs at 222% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Brookdale Sleepy Hollow: 8.4 TCR = 222% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Brookdale Sleepy Hollow safety composite

Brookdale Sleepy Hollow scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 27%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

38/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 8.44 per 100 workers

Safer than 41% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.64 per 100 workers

Safer than 27% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−9.1

2017→2024

Brookdale Sleepy Hollow injury rate improved

Brookdale Sleepy Hollow's TCR fell 9.1 from 15.8 in 2017 to 6.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 16.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.79× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=15.8 · 2018=16.2 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=3.8 · 2022=3.1 · 2023=13.6 · 2024=6.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Amarillo, TX ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 8.4 · 222% of ind

  • DART 6.6 DART
  • RANK #303/470
  • PHOTO Salida Woods by New …
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 18 inj
  • SIZE ~38 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Salida Woods by New Perspective (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Brookdale Sleepy Hollow in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Brookdale Sleepy Hollow averages 8.4 TCR (222% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Brookdale Sleepy Hollow TCR series: 2017=15.8 · 2018=16.2 · 2020=0 · 2021=3.8 · 2022=3.1 · 2023=13.6 · 2024=6.6 · BLS 3.8

Where Brookdale Sleepy Hollow falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 41% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #303 safest of 470 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Texas.

Brookdale Sleepy Hollow (38 employees, TCR 8.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Brookdale Sleepy Hollow
Brookdale Sleepy Hollow (38 employees, TCR 8.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Brookdale Sleepy Hollow has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 6.6 6.6 2 0 0
2023 13.6 13.6 4 0 0
2022 3.1 3.1 1 0 0
2021 3.8 0.0 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 16.2 12.9 5 0 0
2017 15.8 15.8 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · TX · Amarillo

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 351 employers in Amarillo, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Salida Woods by New Perspective 8.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Hattiesburg II 8.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Shasta Estates 8.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cottonwood Creek 8.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bovina Cattle Company 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE PILGRIMS MT. PLEASANT BREEDER AND BROILER 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE United Agricultural- Danevang 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2362/3714-Lubbock, TX-R&D (Monsanto Co.) 38 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amarillo Plant 3,771 FTE
CITY-NEAR BSA Hospital LLC 2,790 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2576-12071000-12071 1,839 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2576-30 1,492 FTE
NAT-TCR Culligan - Tucson 8.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Sitework Developing Inc 8.4 TCR
NAT-TCR McNeilly Wood Products 8.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Corporate Yard 8.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE 116Residence Inn Westlake Village 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pepe Ganga 65th 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Xero Solar 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Millwood Lumber Inc 38 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.