Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · California

Shasta Estates

Redding, CA · ~32 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.4
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Shasta Estates runs at 222% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Shasta Estates: 8.4 TCR = 222% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Shasta Estates safety composite

Shasta Estates scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 11%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

33/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 8.44 per 100 workers

Safer than 41% of industry peers

DART rate
F 12.07 per 100 workers

Safer than 11% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.1

2017→2022

Shasta Estates injury rate improved

Shasta Estates's TCR fell 5.1 from 17.2 in 2017 to 12.1 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2017 at 17.2 TCR. In 2022, DART was 1.43× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=17.2 · 2018=5.2 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=16.2 · 2022=12.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Redding, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 8.4 · 222% of ind

  • DART 12.1 DART
  • RANK #263/635
  • PHOTO Brookdale Sleepy Hol…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~32 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Brookdale Sleepy Hollow (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Shasta Estates in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Shasta Estates averages 8.4 TCR (222% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Shasta Estates TCR series: 2017=17.2 · 2018=5.2 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=16.2 · 2022=12.1 · BLS 3.8

Where Shasta Estates falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 41% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #263 safest of 635 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in California.

Shasta Estates (32 employees, TCR 8.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Shasta Estates
Shasta Estates (32 employees, TCR 8.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Shasta Estates has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 12.1 12.1 2 0 0
2021 16.2 16.2 3 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 5.2 5.2 1 0 0
2017 17.2 5.7 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · CA · Redding

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 207 employers in Redding, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Sleepy Hollow 8.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Salida Woods by New Perspective 8.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Hattiesburg II 8.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cottonwood Creek 8.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Schreiner Farms 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE FIVE POINTS T.I.C. 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE OFFICE 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE Brocchini Farms Inc. 32 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6403-64030151 1,894 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mercy Medical Center Redding 1,789 FTE
CITY-NEAR 64030151-151001 MERCY MEDICAL CENTER REDDING 1,704 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2643-64030151-151001 1,662 FTE
NAT-TCR Grace Composites 8.4 TCR
NAT-TCR NAPA Seattle Main Counter 8.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 4795-Aa-Iad-Washington - Dulles-Iad-Trml 8.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Vaughan & Bushnell Manufacturing Company 8.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Birkey'S Farm Store, Inc - Bloomington 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE 44919 - Ft. Myers Fac. 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE 44831 - Baton Rouge Fac. 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE 42883 - Brooklyn 32 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.