Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · North Carolina

Brookdale South Charlotte

Charlotte, NC · ~53 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
4.5
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Brookdale South Charlotte runs at 118% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade C.

Brookdale South Charlotte: 4.5 TCR = 118% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Brookdale South Charlotte safety composite

Brookdale South Charlotte scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 73% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 37%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

55/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 4.47 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

DART rate
D 4.97 per 100 workers

Safer than 37% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Brookdale South Charlotte: 11.7 → 200.0 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 200.0 TCR · DART/TCR 44.74× in 2024

Brookdale South Charlotte's TCR rose 188.3 from 11.7 in 2016 to 200.0 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 44.74× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Charlotte, NC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 4.5 · 118% of ind

  • DART 200.0 DART
  • RANK #120/356
  • PHOTO Pine Harbour, Inc.
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 15 inj
  • SIZE ~53 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Pine Harbour, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Brookdale South Charlotte in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Brookdale South Charlotte averages 4.5 TCR (118% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Brookdale South Charlotte TCR series: 2016=11.7 · 2017=2.4 · 2018=4.7 · 2019=2.3 · 2020=2.5 · 2022=2.7 · 2023=5 · 2024=200 · BLS 3.8

Where Brookdale South Charlotte falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 73% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #120 safest of 356 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in North Carolina.

Brookdale South Charlotte (53 employees, TCR 4.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Brookdale South Charlotte
Brookdale South Charlotte (53 employees, TCR 4.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Brookdale South Charlotte has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 200.0 200.0 2 0 0
2023 5.0 5.0 2 0 0
2022 2.7 2.7 1 0 0
2020 2.5 2.5 1 0 0
2019 2.3 2.3 1 0 0
2018 4.7 2.4 2 0 0
2017 2.4 0.0 1 0 0
2016 11.7 0.0 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · NC · Charlotte

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 2,058 employers in Charlotte, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Pine Harbour, Inc. 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2248-63004 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Elderwood Village at Vestal 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Clayton House 4.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Sanderson Farms St. Pauls Hatchery 53 FTE
STATE-SIZE CPI USA NC LLC - Southport 53 FTE
STATE-SIZE Goldsboro Resource Center - PNG 53 FTE
STATE-SIZE Master Telecommunications 53 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1101-Carolinas Medical Center (1101) 8,444 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0001-Carolinas Medical Center 8,032 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4795-AA-CLT-CHARLOTTE-CLT-TRML 7,295 FTE
CITY-NEAR Novant Health Presbyterian Medical Center 4,973 FTE
NAT-TCR BTAC 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 1907 Niles 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 3818 Cleveland Heights 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 6509 Gulfgate Mall 4.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Precision Anodizing & Plating Inc. 53 FTE
NAT-SIZE Finish Line Feed Dania 53 FTE
NAT-SIZE Indiana Reclamation and Excavating, Inc. 53 FTE
NAT-SIZE MADO Healthcare Buena Park 53 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.