Anodizing metals and metal products for the trade · California

Precision Anodizing & Plating Inc.

Anaheim, CA · ~53 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Precision Anodizing & Plating Inc. runs at 43% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Anodizing metals and metal products for the trade workplace, earning a grade A.

Precision Anodizing & Plating Inc.: 1.4 TCR = 43% of Anodizing metals and metal products for the trade BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Precision Anodizing & Plating Inc. safety composite

Precision Anodizing & Plating Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 23%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

55/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.41 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.02 per 100 workers

Safer than 23% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Precision Anodizing & Plating Inc.: 0.0 → 4.0 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 4.0 TCR · DART/TCR 2.85× in 2024

Precision Anodizing & Plating Inc.'s TCR rose 4.0 from 0.0 in 2017 to 4.0 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 2.85× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332813 · Anaheim, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.4 · 43% of ind

  • DART 4.0 DART
  • RANK #12/74
  • PHOTO Elite Finishing LLC
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~53 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Elite Finishing LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Precision Anodizing & Plating Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Precision Anodizing & Plating Inc. averages 1.4 TCR (43% of the Anodizing metals and metal products for the trade BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Precision Anodizing & Plating Inc. TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2020=1.9 · 2021=0 · 2022=2 · 2023=1.9 · 2024=4 · BLS 3.3

Where Precision Anodizing & Plating Inc. falls in its industry

585 Anodizing metals and metal pro establishments

Safer than 86% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #12 safest of 74 Anodizing metals and metal pro employers in California.

Precision Anodizing & Plating Inc. (53 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 4.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Precision Anodizing & Plating Inc.
Precision Anodizing & Plating Inc. (53 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 4.0

Precision Anodizing & Plating Inc. has fewer employees than the Anodizing metals and metal products for median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.0 4.0 2 0 0
2023 1.9 1.9 1 0 0
2022 2.0 2.0 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 1.9 1.9 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332813 · CA · Anaheim

585 Anodizing metals and metal products for the trade employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 630 employers in Anaheim, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Elite Finishing LLC 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR General Magnaplate 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR KoMiCo Austin 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Makplate, Inc 1.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE P-R Farms 53 FTE
STATE-SIZE LRC LABOR SERVICES INC 53 FTE
STATE-SIZE Acemi Nursery 53 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ball Tagawa Growers 53 FTE
CITY-NEAR Walt Disney Parks and Resorts U.S. Inc., dba Disneyland Resort 38,057 FTE
CITY-NEAR Walt Disney Parks and Resorts U.S., Inc. d/b/a Disneyland Resort 28,066 FTE
CITY-NEAR Doubletree By Hilton Suites Anaheim 1,933 FTE
CITY-NEAR 08881053 ORANGE CO ANAHEIM MEDICAL CENTER 1,658 FTE
NAT-TCR CF Oswego, LLC 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Ditzfeld Transfer, Inc. 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR State Electric Supply Company - Goldsboro 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 5263 Siloam Springs 1.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Finish Line Feed Dania 53 FTE
NAT-SIZE Brookdale South Charlotte 53 FTE
NAT-SIZE Indiana Reclamation and Excavating, Inc. 53 FTE
NAT-SIZE Brookdale Concord Parkway 53 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.