Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Virginia

Brookdale Staunton

Staunton, VA · ~63 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.3
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Brookdale Staunton runs at 219% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Brookdale Staunton: 8.3 TCR = 219% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Brookdale Staunton safety composite

Brookdale Staunton scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 42%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

59/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 8.34 per 100 workers

Safer than 42% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−19.6

2016→2024

Brookdale Staunton injury rate improved

Brookdale Staunton's TCR fell 19.6 from 19.6 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 19.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=19.6 · 2018=7.4 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=9.0 · 2022=14.7 · 2023=7.6 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Staunton, VA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 8.3 · 219% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #117/199
  • PHOTO SLC Assisted Living
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 31 inj
  • SIZE ~63 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: SLC Assisted Living (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Virginia employers → · Look up another →

Brookdale Staunton in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Brookdale Staunton averages 8.3 TCR (219% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Brookdale Staunton TCR series: 2016=19.6 · 2018=7.4 · 2019=0 · 2020=9 · 2022=14.7 · 2023=7.6 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Brookdale Staunton falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 42% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Virginia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #117 safest of 199 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Virginia.

Brookdale Staunton (63 employees, TCR 8.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Brookdale Staunton
Brookdale Staunton (63 employees, TCR 8.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Brookdale Staunton has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 7.6 7.6 4 0 0
2022 14.7 12.9 8 0 0
2020 9.0 9.0 5 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 7.4 1.9 4 0 0
2016 19.6 13.8 10 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · VA · Staunton

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,673 rated employers in Virginia with headcount on file · 73 employers in Staunton, VA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR SLC Assisted Living 8.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Paulin Creek 8.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lake Barrington Woods 8.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Renaissance - Marinette 8.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Summit Helicopters, Inc. 63 FTE
STATE-SIZE W&L Construction and Paving Inc. 63 FTE
STATE-SIZE Division of Transportation (CON-0125) 63 FTE
STATE-SIZE E Contracting Services, LLC 63 FTE
CITY-NEAR Western State Hospital 762 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1344 329 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 1344 324 FTE
CITY-NEAR Staunton VA 204 FTE
NAT-TCR Howard Lumber and Hardware 8.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Rockport 8.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Texas Midwest Surgery Center 8.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Matthews Roofing Company, Inc. 8.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Randolph Telephone Membership Corporation 63 FTE
NAT-SIZE Myrtle Beach Travel Park 63 FTE
NAT-SIZE S. Slesnick Co. 63 FTE
NAT-SIZE Neenah Technical Materials AP2 63 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.