Local telephone carriers, wired · North Carolina

Randolph Telephone Membership Corporation

Asheboro, NC · ~63 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
1.7
Avg TCR
0.7
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Randolph Telephone Membership Corporation runs at 244% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Local telephone carriers, wired workplace, earning a grade F.

Randolph Telephone Membership Corporation: 1.7 TCR = 244% of Local telephone carriers, wired BLS 0.7 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Randolph Telephone Membership Corporation safety composite

Randolph Telephone Membership Corporation scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 45%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

59/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 1.71 per 100 workers

Safer than 45% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Randolph Telephone Membership Corporation held a steady TCR band

Randolph Telephone Membership Corporation's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 6.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=2.9 · 2018=6.2 · 2020=4.6 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 517110 · Asheboro, NC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 1.7 · 244% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #11/14
  • PHOTO Cox Communications -…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~63 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Cox Communications - Tulsa (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Randolph Telephone Membership Corporation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Randolph Telephone Membership Corporation averages 1.7 TCR (244% of the Local telephone carriers, wired BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Randolph Telephone Membership Corporation TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=2.9 · 2018=6.2 · 2020=4.6 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 0.7

Where Randolph Telephone Membership Corporation falls in its industry

537 Local telephone carriers, wire establishments

Safer than 45% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #11 safest of 14 Local telephone carriers, wire employers in North Carolina.

Randolph Telephone Membership Corporation (63 employees, TCR 1.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 276 employees and a TCR of 1.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Randolph Telephone Membership Corporation
Randolph Telephone Membership Corporation (63 employees, TCR 1.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 276 employees and a TCR of 1.3

Randolph Telephone Membership Corporation has fewer employees than the Local telephone carriers, wired median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 4.6 4.6 3 0 0
2018 6.2 1.5 4 0 0
2017 2.9 1.4 2 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

517110 · NC · Asheboro

537 Local telephone carriers, wired employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 139 employers in Asheboro, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Cox Communications - Tulsa 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR RCSNTXTL 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ben Lomand Connect (Outside Plant) 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hamilton County Telephone Co-op 1.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Smith Energy Complex 63 FTE
STATE-SIZE Union Power Cooperative - Oakboro 63 FTE
STATE-SIZE Asheboro Office 63 FTE
STATE-SIZE SOUTH DURHAM OPERATIONS 63 FTE
CITY-NEAR 8020236-Energizer/Asheboro 1,287 FTE
CITY-NEAR 8020236 Energizer Asheboro 654 FTE
CITY-NEAR Technimark, LLC Plant 5 633 FTE
CITY-NEAR Technimark LLC - Plant 5 466 FTE
NAT-TCR Solomon Kansas 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Neville Place 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Medford Plywood - WP 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Grbr 56ww 1.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Myrtle Beach Travel Park 63 FTE
NAT-SIZE Neenah Technical Materials AP2 63 FTE
NAT-SIZE Brookdale Staunton 63 FTE
NAT-SIZE Good Samaritan Society Corsica 63 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.