Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · Kentucky

Brookdale Stonestreet

Louisville, KY · ~34 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.2
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Brookdale Stonestreet runs at 59% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade B.

Brookdale Stonestreet: 2.2 TCR = 59% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Brookdale Stonestreet safety composite

Brookdale Stonestreet scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 92% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

80/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 2.23 per 100 workers

Safer than 92% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.2

2016→2024

Brookdale Stonestreet injury rate improved

Brookdale Stonestreet's TCR fell 3.2 from 3.2 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 6.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.2 · 2017=6.9 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=3.5 · 2020=0.0 · 2022=4.2 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Louisville, KY AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.2 · 59% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #2/56
  • PHOTO Russellville Park
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~34 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Russellville Park (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Kentucky employers → · Look up another →

Brookdale Stonestreet in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Brookdale Stonestreet averages 2.2 TCR (59% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Brookdale Stonestreet TCR series: 2016=3.2 · 2017=6.9 · 2018=0 · 2019=3.5 · 2020=0 · 2022=4.2 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Brookdale Stonestreet falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 92% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Kentucky alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 56 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Kentucky.

Brookdale Stonestreet (34 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Brookdale Stonestreet
Brookdale Stonestreet (34 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Brookdale Stonestreet has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 4.2 0.0 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 3.5 0.0 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 6.9 0.0 2 0 0
2016 3.2 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · KY · Louisville

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,805 rated employers in Kentucky with headcount on file · 1,638 employers in Louisville, KY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Russellville Park 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cplace Zachary ALF, LLC 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Palms at La Quinta 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR SANDY SPRINGS PLACE P C 2.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Energy Transmission & Substation 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE City Utilities Commission 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Brett Construction 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Haydon Materials, LLC 34 FTE
CITY-NEAR Jefferson County Public Schools 18,524 FTE
CITY-NEAR KYGRA - WORLDPORT 11,933 FTE
CITY-NEAR WORLDPORT (KYGRA) 9,667 FTE
CITY-NEAR KTKY TRUCK 8,757 FTE
NAT-TCR Rainey Electronics, Inc. 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Forristall enterprises, Inc. 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Fox Chase Cancer Center Medical Group, Inc. 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Ottawa 2.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Zelienople Operations 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Shaw Contracting Co 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Clackamas, OR 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Oneida County 34 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.