General merchandise, nondurable goods, merchant wholesalers · New York

Oneida County

Oriskany, NY · ~34 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
3.4
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Oneida County runs at 153% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical General merchandise, nondurable goods, merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade D.

Oneida County: 3.4 TCR = 153% of General merchandise, nondurable goods, merchant wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Oneida County safety composite

Oneida County scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 77% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

60/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.36 per 100 workers

Safer than 50% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 77% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.3

2016→2024

Oneida County injury rate improved

Oneida County's TCR fell 3.3 from 3.3 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 13.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.3 · 2017=4.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=13.8 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=9.3 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 424990 · Oriskany, NY ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 3.4 · 153% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #9/14
  • PHOTO Kiva Sales and Servi…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~34 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Kiva Sales and Services- Alameda (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Oneida County in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Oneida County averages 3.4 TCR (153% of the General merchandise, nondurable goods, merchant wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Oneida County TCR series: 2016=3.3 · 2017=4 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=13.8 · 2021=0 · 2022=9.3 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.2

Where Oneida County falls in its industry

301 General merchandise, nondurabl establishments

Safer than 50% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #9 safest of 14 General merchandise, nondurabl employers in New York.

Oneida County (34 employees, TCR 3.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 3.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Oneida County
Oneida County (34 employees, TCR 3.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 3.4

Oneida County has fewer employees than the General merchandise, nondurable goods, m median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 9.3 0.0 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 13.8 6.9 2 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 4.0 0.0 1 0 0
2016 3.3 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

424990 · NY · Oriskany

301 General merchandise, nondurable goods, merchant wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 15 employers in Oriskany, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Kiva Sales and Services- Alameda 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Next Day Plus 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kaman's Art Shoppes, Inc. COZ 85 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mountain Rose Herbs 3.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Reeves Farms LLC 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Glenview Dairy LLC 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ashland Farm LLC 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Porterdale Farms Inc. 34 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bonide products llc 232 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fiber Instrument Sales, Inc. 230 FTE
CITY-NEAR Trustees of the Eastern Star Hall and Home of the State of New York 138 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Light Connection, Inc. 78 FTE
NAT-TCR West & Barker, Inc. 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Ruppert Landscape - Gainesville 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Davenport Masonry, Inc 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Centre Concrete - State College 3.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Livermore Feedmill 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gratiot County Road Commission 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Brookdale Stonestreet 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE BTL Pallet Corporation 34 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.