Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Georgia

Brookdale Sweetwater Creek

Lithia Springs, GA · ~37 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.0
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Brookdale Sweetwater Creek runs at 236% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Brookdale Sweetwater Creek: 9.0 TCR = 236% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Brookdale Sweetwater Creek safety composite

Brookdale Sweetwater Creek scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 7%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

30/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 8.98 per 100 workers

Safer than 37% of industry peers

DART rate
F 15.6 per 100 workers

Safer than 7% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Brookdale Sweetwater Creek: 11.3 → 15.6 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 15.6 TCR · DART/TCR 1.74× in 2018

Brookdale Sweetwater Creek's TCR rose 4.3 from 11.3 in 2016 to 15.6 in 2018. In 2018, DART was 1.74× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Lithia Springs, GA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 9.0 · 236% of ind

  • DART 15.6 DART
  • RANK #124/205
  • PHOTO Christopher Heights …
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~37 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Christopher Heights of Webster (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Brookdale Sweetwater Creek in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Brookdale Sweetwater Creek averages 9.0 TCR (236% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Brookdale Sweetwater Creek TCR series: 2016=11.3 · 2017=0 · 2018=15.6 · BLS 3.8

Where Brookdale Sweetwater Creek falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 37% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #124 safest of 205 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Georgia.

Brookdale Sweetwater Creek (37 employees, TCR 9.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Brookdale Sweetwater Creek
Brookdale Sweetwater Creek (37 employees, TCR 9.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Brookdale Sweetwater Creek has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 15.6 15.6 5 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 11.3 7.6 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · GA · Lithia Springs

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 122 employers in Lithia Springs, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Christopher Heights of Webster 9.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Landings of Oregon 9.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR All Seasons Health - Cedar City 9.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Village at Seven Oaks Assisted Living & Memory Care 9.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE JJ Georgia Warehouse 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Clary Logging Inc 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Plant Tugalo 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Brevard Office 37 FTE
CITY-NEAR Silver Line Building Products 897 FTE
CITY-NEAR Home Chef - Skyview 673 FTE
CITY-NEAR GA-LITHI02 671 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lithia Springs, GA - Sydney Ct 655 FTE
NAT-TCR 6400-Swy 0023 2475 9.0 TCR
NAT-TCR ORANGE PARK 357 College Dr 9.0 TCR
NAT-TCR South Bend Ave South Bend IN Store 9.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Cornerstone Village North - Sherwood 9.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE InTech Integrated Marketing Services, LLC 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE Brookdale Oak Ridge 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE Atmosphere Annealing LLC, Bassett St. Facility 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pacific Ethanol Columbia, LLC 37 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.