Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Massachusetts

Christopher Heights of Webster

Webster, MA · ~52 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.0
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Christopher Heights of Webster runs at 236% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Christopher Heights of Webster: 9.0 TCR = 236% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Christopher Heights of Webster safety composite

Christopher Heights of Webster scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 36%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

40/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 8.98 per 100 workers

Safer than 37% of industry peers

DART rate
D 5.16 per 100 workers

Safer than 36% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Christopher Heights of Webster held a steady TCR band

Christopher Heights of Webster's TCR held near 0.0 from 5.2 in 2018 to 5.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 35.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.57× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=5.2 · 2019=5.2 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=35.5 · 2022=2.7 · 2023=9.1 · 2024=5.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Webster, MA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 9.0 · 236% of ind

  • DART 5.2 DART
  • RANK #122/210
  • PHOTO Landings of Oregon
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~52 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Landings of Oregon (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Massachusetts employers → · Look up another →

Christopher Heights of Webster in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Christopher Heights of Webster averages 9.0 TCR (236% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Christopher Heights of Webster TCR series: 2018=5.2 · 2019=5.2 · 2020=0 · 2021=35.5 · 2022=2.7 · 2023=9.1 · 2024=5.2 · BLS 3.8

Where Christopher Heights of Webster falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 37% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Massachusetts alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #122 safest of 210 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Massachusetts.

Christopher Heights of Webster (52 employees, TCR 9.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Christopher Heights of Webster
Christopher Heights of Webster (52 employees, TCR 9.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Christopher Heights of Webster has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.2 5.2 1 1 0
2023 9.1 9.1 4 0 0
2022 2.7 2.7 1 0 0
2021 35.5 35.5 3 10 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 5.2 5.2 2 0 0
2018 5.2 5.2 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · MA · Webster

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,108 rated employers in Massachusetts with headcount on file · 46 employers in Webster, MA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Landings of Oregon 9.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR All Seasons Health - Cedar City 9.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Village at Seven Oaks Assisted Living & Memory Care 9.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Spring Haven Retirement 9.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE SunBug Solar 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE North East Specialty Corp. 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tocci Building Corporation 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE Timberline Communications Inc. 52 FTE
CITY-NEAR Jeffco Fibres, Inc. 232 FTE
CITY-NEAR WEBSTER #240 226 FTE
CITY-NEAR 226_358 190 FTE
CITY-NEAR Industrial Packaging 187 FTE
NAT-TCR Highland Springs Care Center 9.0 TCR
NAT-TCR First Coast Region - New Location 9.0 TCR
NAT-TCR City of Sandstone 9.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Schott's Repair Service, INC. 9.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Store 1031 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE Park Avenue Associates in Radiology, PC 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE Evergreen Construction 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE 1816 Industrial Way 52 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.