Continuing care retirement communities · Texas

Brookdale Westlake Hills

Austin, TX · ~260 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.7
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Brookdale Westlake Hills runs at 175% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Continuing care retirement communities workplace, earning a grade D.

Brookdale Westlake Hills: 6.7 TCR = 175% of Continuing care retirement communities BLS 3.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Brookdale Westlake Hills safety composite

Brookdale Westlake Hills scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 36%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

46/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 6.66 per 100 workers

Safer than 52% of industry peers

DART rate
D 5.13 per 100 workers

Safer than 36% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Brookdale Westlake Hills held a steady TCR band

Brookdale Westlake Hills's TCR held near 0.3 from 7.0 in 2016 to 6.7 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2018 at 8.8 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.77× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=7.0 · 2017=8.6 · 2018=8.8 · 2019=5.9 · 2020=4.9 · 2021=8.1 · 2022=3.5 · 2023=6.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Austin, TX ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 6.7 · 175% of ind

  • DART 5.1 DART
  • RANK #134/220
  • PHOTO Chandler Place
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 114 inj
  • SIZE ~260 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Chandler Place (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Brookdale Westlake Hills in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Brookdale Westlake Hills averages 6.7 TCR (175% of the Continuing care retirement communities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Brookdale Westlake Hills TCR series: 2016=7 · 2017=8.6 · 2018=8.8 · 2019=5.9 · 2020=4.9 · 2021=8.1 · 2022=3.5 · 2023=6.7 · BLS 3.8

Where Brookdale Westlake Hills falls in its industry

4,127 Continuing care retirement com establishments

Safer than 52% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #134 safest of 220 Continuing care retirement com employers in Texas.

Brookdale Westlake Hills (260 employees, TCR 6.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Brookdale Westlake Hills
Brookdale Westlake Hills (260 employees, TCR 6.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Brookdale Westlake Hills has more employees than the Continuing care retirement communities median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 6.7 5.1 13 0 0
2022 3.5 3.0 7 0 0
2021 8.1 6.5 16 0 0
2020 4.9 4.4 10 0 0
2019 5.9 5.4 13 0 0
2018 8.8 8.4 20 0 0
2017 8.6 5.9 19 0 0
2016 7.0 6.5 16 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · TX · Austin

4,127 Continuing care retirement communities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 1,645 employers in Austin, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Chandler Place 6.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Raincross at Riverside 6.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR DORSET PLACE A L 6.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Azura Memory Care of Oak Creek 6.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Technology Lifecycle Management Schlumberger 260 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bobcat Power 260 FTE
STATE-SIZE Construction 260 FTE
STATE-SIZE Murray-Ward Contracting Inc. 260 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ensign Services 11,325 FTE
CITY-NEAR NA-US-TX-Austin-Giga Texas 8,621 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6017-Loc: CORP LOC - US Austin 6,911 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6017-CORP LOC - USA UNITED STATES - AST 5,272 FTE
NAT-TCR New Vistas 6.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Village of Shiloh 6.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Office & Thermoforming 6.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Germantown Hills Fire Protection District 6.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Fontana Terminal 260 FTE
NAT-SIZE GENESYS Industrial Corporation 260 FTE
NAT-SIZE 55826 El Cajon 260 FTE
NAT-SIZE Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. 260 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.