Warehousing and storage, general merchandise · Texas

Michaels Distribution Center #1821

Fort Worth, TX · ~260 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
12.1
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Michaels Distribution Center #1821 runs at 209% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Warehousing and storage, general merchandise workplace, earning a grade F.

Michaels Distribution Center #1821: 12.1 TCR = 209% of Warehousing and storage, general merchandise BLS 5.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Michaels Distribution Center #1821 safety composite

Michaels Distribution Center #1821 scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 5%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

17/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 12.13 per 100 workers

Safer than 5% of industry peers

DART rate
F 9.89 per 100 workers

Safer than 7% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.9

2017→2018

Michaels Distribution Center #1821 injury rate improved

Michaels Distribution Center #1821's TCR fell 2.9 from 13.6 in 2017 to 10.7 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2017 at 13.6 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0.82× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=13.6 · 2018=10.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · Fort Worth, TX ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 12.1 · 209% of ind

  • DART 9.9 DART
  • RANK #818/846
  • PHOTO Smyrna, TN
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 41 inj
  • SIZE ~260 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Smyrna, TN (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Michaels Distribution Center #1821 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Michaels Distribution Center #1821 averages 12.1 TCR (209% of the Warehousing and storage, general merchandise BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Michaels Distribution Center #1821 TCR series: 2017=13.6 · 2018=10.7 · BLS 5.8

Where Michaels Distribution Center #1821 falls in its industry

9,477 Warehousing and storage, gener establishments

Safer than 5% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #818 safest of 846 Warehousing and storage, gener employers in Texas.

Michaels Distribution Center #1821 (260 employees, TCR 12.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Michaels Distribution Center #1821
Michaels Distribution Center #1821 (260 employees, TCR 12.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Michaels Distribution Center #1821 has more employees than the Warehousing and storage, general merchan median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 10.7 9.9 23 4 0
2017 13.6 1.8 18 5 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · TX · Fort Worth

9,477 Warehousing and storage, general merchandise employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 1,346 employers in Fort Worth, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Smyrna, TN 12.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR NRI USA, LLC - LI 12.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Amazon.com Services LLC - BFI3 12.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Warehouse RET-TCP 12.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Technology Lifecycle Management Schlumberger 260 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bobcat Power 260 FTE
STATE-SIZE Construction 260 FTE
STATE-SIZE Murray-Ward Contracting Inc. 260 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lockheed Martin Corporation US TX Fort Worth Lockheed Blvd (1093) 16,547 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lockheed Martin Corporation Fort Worth Campus (1093) 13,805 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cook Children's Medical Center 4,998 FTE
CITY-NEAR TX- Fort Worth 4,667 FTE
NAT-TCR Holland - KC 12.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Wilson Trailer Sales Plant 7 12.1 TCR
NAT-TCR 054 ABC Supply Co., Inc 12.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Cebtral Freight Lines, Inc. - Hayward 12.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE MPS Woodridge 260 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mountain's Edge Hospital 260 FTE
NAT-SIZE Southland Tube Inc. 260 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mobile Center (Almob) 260 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.