Skilled nursing facilities · Washington

Brookfield Health & Rehabilitation of Cascadia

Battle Ground, WA · ~61 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
7.0
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Brookfield Health & Rehabilitation of Cascadia runs at 107% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Skilled nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade C.

Brookfield Health & Rehabilitation of Cascadia: 7.0 TCR = 107% of Skilled nursing facilities BLS 6.5 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Brookfield Health & Rehabilitation of Cascadia safety composite

Brookfield Health & Rehabilitation of Cascadia scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 14%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

36/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 6.97 per 100 workers

Safer than 47% of industry peers

DART rate
F 11.12 per 100 workers

Safer than 14% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Brookfield Health & Rehabilitation of Cascadia: 9.3 → 13.0 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 13.0 TCR · DART/TCR 1.6× in 2023

Brookfield Health & Rehabilitation of Cascadia's TCR rose 3.7 from 9.3 in 2018 to 13.0 in 2023. In 2023, DART was 1.6× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Battle Ground, WA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 7.0 · 107% of ind

  • DART 11.1 DART
  • RANK #60/190
  • PHOTO Life Care Centers of…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 16 inj
  • SIZE ~61 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Life Care Centers of America Inc dba Life Care Center of Yuma (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Washington employers → · Look up another →

Brookfield Health & Rehabilitation of Cascadia in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Brookfield Health & Rehabilitation of Cascadia averages 7.0 TCR (107% of the Skilled nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-09-26

Brookfield Health & Rehabilitation of Cascadia TCR series: 2018=9.3 · 2019=2.4 · 2020=7.4 · 2021=2.7 · 2023=13 · BLS 6.5

Where Brookfield Health & Rehabilitation of Cascadia falls in its industry

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities establishments

Safer than 47% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Washington alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #60 safest of 190 Skilled nursing facilities employers in Washington.

Brookfield Health & Rehabilitation of Cascadia (61 employees, TCR 7.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Brookfield Health & Rehabilitation of Cascadia
Brookfield Health & Rehabilitation of Cascadia (61 employees, TCR 7.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Brookfield Health & Rehabilitation of Cascadia has fewer employees than the Skilled nursing facilities median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 13.0 11.1 7 0 0
2021 2.7 2.7 1 0 0
2020 7.4 7.4 3 0 0
2019 2.4 2.4 1 0 0
2018 9.3 9.3 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · WA · Battle Ground

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,147 rated employers in Washington with headcount on file · 30 employers in Battle Ground, WA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Life Care Centers of America Inc dba Life Care Center of Yuma 7.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Elizabeth Hospice 7.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR AMC 7.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Evansville Protestant Home 7.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE 2073-SW-20730060-CS 61 FTE
STATE-SIZE Maplewood Gardens Assisted Living 61 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lakefield Veterinary Group - 186 61 FTE
STATE-SIZE ATS Trans LLC 61 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tapani Underground 457 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 5929 313 FTE
CITY-NEAR Battle Ground 312 FTE
CITY-NEAR 701-00614 259 FTE
NAT-TCR Boltex Manufacturing Company Inc 7.0 TCR
NAT-TCR RK-095-Knoxville ( RK-095 ) 7.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Norfolk w/JV 7.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Preach Incorporated 7.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Raleigh Vending 61 FTE
NAT-SIZE 1970-03989B 61 FTE
NAT-SIZE Midland Pub Sch* 61 FTE
NAT-SIZE Biloxi Public Schools* 61 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.