Electric power generation, hydroelectric · Pennsylvania

Brookfield Renewable - Safe Harbor

Conestoga, PA · ~34 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
2.5
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Brookfield Renewable - Safe Harbor runs at 212% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Electric power generation, hydroelectric workplace, earning a grade F.

Brookfield Renewable - Safe Harbor: 2.5 TCR = 212% of Electric power generation, hydroelectric BLS 1.2 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Brookfield Renewable - Safe Harbor safety composite

Brookfield Renewable - Safe Harbor scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 59% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 31%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

47/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.54 per 100 workers

Safer than 59% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.39 per 100 workers

Safer than 31% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.3

2016→2024

Brookfield Renewable - Safe Harbor injury rate improved

Brookfield Renewable - Safe Harbor's TCR fell 4.3 from 6.7 in 2016 to 2.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 7.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.94× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=6.7 · 2017=7.5 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=2.1 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=2.0 · 2023=2.2 · 2024=2.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221111 · Conestoga, PA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 2.5 · 212% of ind

  • DART 2.4 DART
  • RANK P59
  • PHOTO 705-NiSource-Montice…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~34 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 705-NiSource-Monticello IN-Operating HQ (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Brookfield Renewable - Safe Harbor in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Brookfield Renewable - Safe Harbor averages 2.5 TCR (212% of the Electric power generation, hydroelectric BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Brookfield Renewable - Safe Harbor TCR series: 2016=6.7 · 2017=7.5 · 2018=0 · 2019=2.1 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=2 · 2023=2.2 · 2024=2.4 · BLS 1.2

Where Brookfield Renewable - Safe Harbor falls in its industry

129 Electric power generation, hyd establishments

Safer than 59% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers
Brookfield Renewable - Safe Harbor (34 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Brookfield Renewable - Safe Harbor
Brookfield Renewable - Safe Harbor (34 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 3.3

Brookfield Renewable - Safe Harbor has fewer employees than the Electric power generation, hydroelectric median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.4 2.4 1 0 0
2023 2.2 2.2 1 0 0
2022 2.0 2.0 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 2.1 2.1 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 7.5 2.5 1 2 0
2016 6.7 2.2 1 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221111 · PA · Conestoga

129 Electric power generation, hydroelectric employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 4 employers in Conestoga, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 705-NiSource-Monticello IN-Operating HQ 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rainbow Dam 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wisconsin Valley Improvement Company 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Avista Noxon 2.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Kaolin Mushroom Farms - West Grove Facility 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE George Didden Greenhouse 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kreider Farms - Dairy 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE R.W. Sauder Inc 34 FTE
CITY-NEAR D690-M001 807 FTE
CITY-NEAR Turkey Hill LLC 796 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lancaster EMS - Conestoga 160 FTE
NAT-TCR Volvo of Cincinnati,Porsche of the Village,Maserati of Cincinnati 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Mason City IA Site 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Takeda Covington 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Lovelady Plant 2.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Ken Becker & Sons Inc 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Waas Boring & Cable Inc 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sterling - Lowell, MA 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Missouri Pressed Metals, Inc. 34 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.