Hydroelectric power generation · Wisconsin

Wisconsin Valley Improvement Company

Wausau, WI · ~36 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
2.5
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Wisconsin Valley Improvement Company runs at 207% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Hydroelectric power generation workplace, earning a grade F.

Wisconsin Valley Improvement Company: 2.5 TCR = 207% of Hydroelectric power generation BLS 1.2 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Wisconsin Valley Improvement Company safety composite

Wisconsin Valley Improvement Company scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 76% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

64/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.48 per 100 workers

Safer than 60% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 76% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Wisconsin Valley Improvement Company held a steady TCR band

Wisconsin Valley Improvement Company's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 7.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=0.0 · 2019=7.0 · 2020=7.8 · 2021=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221111 · Wausau, WI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 2.5 · 207% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #5/8
  • PHOTO Avista Noxon
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~36 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Avista Noxon (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Wisconsin Valley Improvement Company in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Wisconsin Valley Improvement Company averages 2.5 TCR (207% of the Hydroelectric power generation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Wisconsin Valley Improvement Company TCR series: 2018=0 · 2019=7 · 2020=7.8 · 2021=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 1.2

Where Wisconsin Valley Improvement Company falls in its industry

129 Hydroelectric power generation establishments

Safer than 60% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 8 Hydroelectric power generation employers in Wisconsin.

Wisconsin Valley Improvement Company (36 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Wisconsin Valley Improvement Company
Wisconsin Valley Improvement Company (36 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 3.3

Wisconsin Valley Improvement Company has fewer employees than the Hydroelectric power generation median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 7.8 0.0 1 0 0
2019 7.0 0.0 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221111 · WI · Wausau

129 Hydroelectric power generation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 153 employers in Wausau, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Avista Noxon 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rainbow Dam 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookfield Renewable - Safe Harbor 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR 705-NiSource-Monticello IN-Operating HQ 2.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Rolling Hills Diary Farm, LLC 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE T & T Quality Cutting LLC 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Barron Electric Cooperative 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kaerek Homes, Inc. 36 FTE
CITY-NEAR Aspirus Wausau Hospital 2,551 FTE
CITY-NEAR Aspirus Inc 1,055 FTE
CITY-NEAR Aspirus Clinic Inc. 931 FTE
CITY-NEAR Kolbe & Kolbe Millwork Co., Inc. 900 FTE
NAT-TCR Mennie Machine 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR B95 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Branch 3637 - Houston 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR West Bridgewater Medical Investors Limited Partnership d/b/d Life Care Center of West Bridgewater 2.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Orion Industries Incorporated 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE 27-TN 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pateco Services Gwinnett 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE CHI Greenhouse LLC 36 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.