Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) · New York

Brooklyn Navy Yard Cogeneration Plant

Brooklyn, NY · ~38 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
1.2
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Brooklyn Navy Yard Cogeneration Plant runs at 102% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) workplace, earning a grade C.

Brooklyn Navy Yard Cogeneration Plant: 1.2 TCR = 102% of Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) BLS 1.2 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Brooklyn Navy Yard Cogeneration Plant safety composite

Brooklyn Navy Yard Cogeneration Plant scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 71% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

61/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.22 per 100 workers

Safer than 58% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.4

2016→2017

Brooklyn Navy Yard Cogeneration Plant injury rate improved

Brooklyn Navy Yard Cogeneration Plant's TCR fell 2.4 from 2.4 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2017. Peak filing year was 2016 at 2.4 TCR. In 2017, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.4 · 2017=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221112 · Brooklyn, NY ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 1.2 · 102% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #9/29
  • PHOTO Plant Ratcliffe
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~38 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Plant Ratcliffe (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Brooklyn Navy Yard Cogeneration Plant in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Brooklyn Navy Yard Cogeneration Plant averages 1.2 TCR (102% of the Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Brooklyn Navy Yard Cogeneration Plant TCR series: 2016=2.4 · 2017=0 · BLS 1.2

Where Brooklyn Navy Yard Cogeneration Plant falls in its industry

846 Electric power generation, fos establishments

Safer than 58% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #9 safest of 29 Electric power generation, fos employers in New York.

Brooklyn Navy Yard Cogeneration Plant (38 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Brooklyn Navy Yard Cogeneration Plant
Brooklyn Navy Yard Cogeneration Plant (38 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5

Brooklyn Navy Yard Cogeneration Plant has fewer employees than the Electric power generation, fossil fuel ( median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 2.4 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221112 · NY · Brooklyn

846 Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 941 employers in Brooklyn, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Plant Ratcliffe 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Red Oak Power. LLC 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Coyote Station 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR New Castle Generating Station 1.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Spruce Haven Farm, LLC 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Aurora-Oakwood Dairy, LLC 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Eldred Brothers / Main Farm 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hanehan Family Dairy, LLC 38 FTE
CITY-NEAR EDI - Brooklyn 946 9,270 FTE
CITY-NEAR S & A Unified Home Care, Inc. 7,782 FTE
CITY-NEAR Maimonides Medical Center 6,641 FTE
CITY-NEAR NYU Langone Hospital - Brooklyn 5,690 FTE
NAT-TCR Powhatan Reception and Classification Center 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Bridgeport 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR San Marcos Operations 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Us Inside Sales - Phoenix (Azs51) 1.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE N and R of Bloomfield LLC 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE 120 Rider Avenue PCH Operating Company, LP 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Skyline Surgery Center 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Main Office 38 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.