Screening and sifting machinery for general industrial use manufacturing · Minnesota

Brown and Bigelow

Name: Brown and Bigelow Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

Saint Paul, MN · ~159 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

A
Excellent Safety Record: 1.1
Avg TCR: 3.3
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Brown and Bigelow runs at 32% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Screening and sifting machinery for general industrial use manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Brown and Bigelow: 1.1 TCR = 32% of Screening and sifting machinery for general industrial use manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Brown and Bigelow safety composite

Brown and Bigelow scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 82% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 32%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

57/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): B 1.05 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers
DART rate: F 1.77 per 100 workers

Safer than 32% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Brown and Bigelow: 0.3 → 1.8 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 1.8 TCR · DART/TCR 1.69× in 2019

Brown and Bigelow's TCR rose 1.4 from 0.3 in 2018 to 1.8 in 2019. In 2019, DART was 1.69× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333999 · Saint Paul, MN AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.1 · 32% of ind

DART 1.8 DART
RANK #3/12
PHOTO Pentair
BOOK 2y book
INJ 2 inj
SIZE ~159 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Pentair (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

This site

1.1
PAR Systems

1.1
Trucent Indust

1.1
Pearce Pump Su

1.1
Pentair

1

What this shows Brown and Bigelow averages 1.1 TCR (32% of the Screening and sifting machinery for general industrial use manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Brown and Bigelow TCR series: 2018=0.3 · 2019=1.8 · BLS 3.3

Where Brown and Bigelow falls in its industry

242 Screening and sifting machiner establishments

Safer than 82% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

Grade A

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 12 Screening and sifting machiner employers in Minnesota.

Brown and Bigelow (159 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 81 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Brown and Bigelow has more employees than the Screening and sifting machinery for gene median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries	Illnesses	Fatalities
2019	1.8	1.8	1	0	0
2018	0.3	0.3	1	0	0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333999 · MN · Saint Paul

242 Screening and sifting machinery for general industrial use manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 291 employers in Saint Paul, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	Pentair	CONROE, TX	1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR	PAR Systems	SHOREVIEW, MN	1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Trucent Industrial Technologies and Services	NOBLESVILLE, IN	1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Pearce Pump Supply	PRAIRIEVILLE, LA	1.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE	Elk River Campus	ELK RIVER	159 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Minneapolis SE Storage-TJ	MINNEAPOLIS	159 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Rich Products Fridley	FRIDLEY	159 FTE
STATE-SIZE	American Surplus & Mfg., Inc (Ice Castle Fish Houses)	MONTEVIDEO	159 FTE
CITY-NEAR	HE-Midway Corporate Campus	Saint Paul	2,194 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Minnesota Department of Public Safety	Saint Paul	2,100 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Minnesota Department of Human Services, Central Office, Andersen, DC1 & Golden Rule	Saint Paul	1,486 FTE
CITY-NEAR	FV St Josephs Hospital	Saint Paul	1,426 FTE
NAT-TCR	Saueressig New Berlin WI	New Berlin, WI	1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR	FFT	Erlanger, KY	1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR	Rivers Edge Nursing and Rehabilitation	Prospect, KY	1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR	Tetra Dynamics	West Babylon, NY	1.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE	Trans-Med Ambulance Inc.	Luzerne, PA	159 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Windsor Marketing Group	Suffield, CT	159 FTE
NAT-SIZE	T Don Hutto Residential Center	Taylor, TX	159 FTE
NAT-SIZE	CROSSROADS	Shelby, MT	159 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.