Heating, ventilation and air-conditioning (HVAC) contractors · Colorado

Bruce Mechanical of Colorado, Inc.

Denver, CO · ~83 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.5
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Bruce Mechanical of Colorado, Inc. runs at 54% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Heating, ventilation and air-conditioning (HVAC) contractors workplace, earning a grade B.

Bruce Mechanical of Colorado, Inc.: 1.5 TCR = 54% of Heating, ventilation and air-conditioning (HVAC) contractors BLS 2.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Bruce Mechanical of Colorado, Inc. safety composite

Bruce Mechanical of Colorado, Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

62/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.5 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.01 per 100 workers

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Bruce Mechanical of Colorado, Inc.: 1.5 → 3.0 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 3.0 TCR · DART/TCR 0.67× in 2024

Bruce Mechanical of Colorado, Inc.'s TCR rose 1.5 from 1.5 in 2022 to 3.0 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0.67× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238220 · Denver, CO AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 1.5 · 54% of ind

  • DART 1.0 DART
  • RANK #24/156
  • PHOTO Elliott-Lewis Corpor…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~83 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Elliott-Lewis Corporation (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Colorado employers → · Look up another →

Bruce Mechanical of Colorado, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Bruce Mechanical of Colorado, Inc. averages 1.5 TCR (54% of the Heating, ventilation and air-conditioning (HVAC) contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Bruce Mechanical of Colorado, Inc. TCR series: 2022=1.5 · 2023=0 · 2024=3 · BLS 2.8

Where Bruce Mechanical of Colorado, Inc. falls in its industry

5,793 Heating, ventilation and air-c establishments

Safer than 78% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Colorado alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #24 safest of 156 Heating, ventilation and air-c employers in Colorado.

Bruce Mechanical of Colorado, Inc. (83 employees, TCR 1.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Bruce Mechanical of Colorado, Inc.
Bruce Mechanical of Colorado, Inc. (83 employees, TCR 1.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3

Bruce Mechanical of Colorado, Inc. has more employees than the Heating, ventilation and air-conditionin median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.0 1.0 3 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 1.5 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238220 · CO · Denver

5,793 Heating, ventilation and air-conditioning (HVAC) contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,007 rated employers in Colorado with headcount on file · 1,757 employers in Denver, CO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Elliott-Lewis Corporation 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Total Fire Protection, Inc. 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR ACI Mechanical, Inc. 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Illinois Piping Corporation 1.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Little Valley Wholesale Nursery 83 FTE
STATE-SIZE Longs Peak Dairy LLC GALETON 83 FTE
STATE-SIZE Main Office 83 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ideal Fencing Corp LLC 83 FTE
CITY-NEAR DEN DEN 9,832 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6925-DEN 6,769 FTE
CITY-NEAR DEN - Airport United Airlines Offices 5,277 FTE
CITY-NEAR CO-01 4,581 FTE
NAT-TCR Four Cents Holdings LLC - DBA Hopkins Printing 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Rural Route 1 Popcorn 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Mannington-Salem 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Concrete Edge by Andrade Bros Inc 1.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Traverse City Ophthalmology 83 FTE
NAT-SIZE Indianhead Medical Center 83 FTE
NAT-SIZE Regional Water Resource Agency 83 FTE
NAT-SIZE Renaissance Indianapolis North 83 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.